Hoye v. City of Oakland
Filing
67
ORDER to continue motion proceedings re 66 Stipulation filed by Walter B. Hoye, II, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 66 Stipulation. Motions due by 3/6/2009.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/06/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Michael Millen, Esq. 119 Calle Marguerita #100 Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 871-0777
MICHAEL MILLEN, Bar No. 151731 Attorney at Law 119 Calle Marguerita Ste. 100 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Telephone: (408) 871-0777 Facsimile: (408) 516-9861 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiffs ANGELA L. P ADILLA, Bar No. 154863 SARAH C. MARRIOTT, Bar No. 241301 ERIN H. REDING, Bar No. 252691 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 405 Howard St. San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 John A. Russo, Bar No. 129729 Vicki Laden, Bar No. 130147 City of Oakland 1 Frank Ogawa Plaza, 6th Fl. Oakland, CA 94612 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF OAKLAND Telephone: (510) 238-4941 Facsimile: (510) 238-6500
UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA W AL TER B. HOYE, II, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant. NO.: C07-6411 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SUMMARY JUDGMENT DATE
STIPULATION AND ORDER
C07-6411 CRB
Page 1
1 2 3 4 5 6
Based upon stipulation and good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that the summary judgment schedule previously set be changed as follows: Last Date to file for Summary Judgment: March 6, 2009.
Hearing Date: 35 days after above date at 10:00 a.m. Counsel to notice motion in accordance with the local rules.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Michael Millen, Esq. 119 Calle Marguerita #100 Los Gatos, CA 95032 (408) 871-0777
Dated: January 6, 2009
UNIT ED
S
7
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
STIPULATION AND ORDER
C07-6411 CRB
LI
Page 2
FO
J
arles R udge Ch
. Breyer
R NIA
RD CHARLES BREYER IS SO O ITDISTRICT COURT JUDGE U.S.
ERED
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?