Securities and Exchange Commission v. Olins et al

Filing 189

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 7, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION v. ROBERT OLINS, SPATIALIGHT, INC. and ARGYLE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP., Defendants. 19 On June 30, 2014, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Notice of 20 Motion, Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert 21 Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court. The hearing on the motion is currently 22 scheduled for August 8, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 23 After receiving the motion via the Court’s Case Management/Electronic Case File 24 System, on July 3, 2014, counsel for defendant Robert Olins contacted Plaintiff’s counsel. The 25 motion was a surprise to defendant Olins as he had been participating in the liquidation of JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 1 1 assets by a receiver through the judgment filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern 2 District of New York (1:11-mc-00261-P1). The parties discussed some of the matters 3 contained in the Motion, but agreed to allow defense counsel to research the matters 4 contained in the Motion and to meet and confer regarding those matters. The parties agreed 5 that a short continuance of the hearing on the Motion was in order to allow the parties to have 6 meaningful discussions. 7 On July 3, 2014, defense counsel also contacted the Court’s Courtroom Deputy who 8 indicated that the Court was available to hear the motion on the parties’ selected date of 9 September 26, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. 10 Defense counsel, located in the Northern District of California, who will appear at the 11 hearing on this Motion is also out of the district between July 26 and August 20, 2014, and 12 would be unavailable to appear at the August 8, 2014 hearing date. 13 As such, to allow for a meaningful meet and confer and due to counsel’s unavailability, 14 the parties stipulate and request that the Court vacate the hearing date of August 8, 2014, and 15 continue the hearing to September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. The parties further stipulate and 16 request that Defendant will file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. 17 Plaintiff will file any reply on or before September 3, 2014. 18 SO STIPULATED: 19 20 Dated: July 7, 2014 ______/s/______________________ JOHN S. SILBERMAN Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Dated: July 7, 2014 _____/s/____________________ EDWIN PRATHER Attorney for Defendant ROBERT OLINS 21 22 23 24 25 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 2 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and per the parties’ stipulation, the hearing for 3 4 5 Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court is hereby continued until September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Defendant will 6 file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. Plaintiff will file any reply on or 7 before September 3, 2014. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 July 7, 2014 Dated: ____________________ 10 _______________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION [Case No.: CV 07-6423 MMC] 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?