Securities and Exchange Commission v. Olins et al

Filing 211

ORDER ON STIPULATION RE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The evidentiary hearing, currently set for March 23 and 24, 2015, is vacated and continued until July 6 and 7, 2015. Mr. Olins must be present. The parties shall file a joint prehearing statement no later than June 22, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 3, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 v. Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT ROBERT OLINS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT ROBERT OLINS, et al., Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion for 20 Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court. 21 The parties appeared on the Motion before on September 26, 2014. 22 At the September 26, 2014 hearing on the Motion, Plaintiff identified areas in which it 23 sought to conduct discovery, including but not limited to taking Mr. Olins’ deposition. Plaintiff 24 indicated its intent to seek discovery from multiple parties and also from a foreign jurisdiction. 25 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT ROBERT OLINS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC] 1 1 The Court reserved March 23 and 24, 2015, for a two-day evidentiary hearing on the matter 2 and ordered Mr. Olins present. 3 Due to on-going discovery and other yet-to-be-finalized matters, the Court also directed 4 the parties to submit a joint prehearing statement, on or before March 9, 2015, to address any 5 continuing concerns. 6 As of today’s date, Plaintiff has taken several depositions, including Mr. Olins’ deposition 7 in New York, and served subpoenas for documents on a number of parties. Plaintiff has 8 identified additional parties that it intends on serving with subpoenas for depositions and 9 additional documents. Plaintiff also indicates that it is currently corresponding with the 10 Attorney General’s Office for the Isle of Man in an attempt to obtain possibly relevant business 11 records. 12 Due to on going discovery which Plaintiff is entitled, to allow the parties to review and 13 analyze said discovery, and to allow the parties to continue to meet and confer regarding 14 discovery and any resultant issues, the parties seek to continue the hearing, currently set for 15 March 23 and 24, 2015, until July 6 and 7, 2015. The date appears to be available based on 16 communications with the Court’s Clerk. The parties will provide the Court with a joint status 17 brief on June 22, 2015. 18 19 SO STIPULATED: Dated: March 2, 2015 ______/s/______________________ JOHN SILBERMANN Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Dated: March 2, 2015 _____/s/____________________ EDWIN PRATHER Attorney for Defendant ROBERT OLINS 20 21 22 23 24 25 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT ROBERT OLINS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC] 2 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 5 6 7 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and per the parties’ stipulation, the evidentiary hearing currently set for March 23 and 24, 2015, is vacated. The Court will conduct the evidentiary hearing on July 6 and 7, 2015. Mr. Olins must be present. The parties are directed to provide the Court with a joint prehearing statement, on or before, June 22, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 March 3, 2015 Dated: ____________________ _______________________________ HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT ROBERT OLINS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT [Case No.: C 07-6423 MMC] 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?