Iwu v. Genesis Lending Group, Inc. et al

Filing 42

FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference previously set for 3/2/9 at 9:30 AM has been re-set for 4/6/2009 at 09:30 AM. Chambers telephone report prev. set for 2/13/9 has been continued to 3/20/9. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/5/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:07-cv-06506-CRB Document 41 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES RICHARD JAY BLASKEY RICHARD JAY BLASKEY, ESQ. - BAR NO. 89223 rjblaw@1stcounsel.com Plaza Huntington Beach 17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5998 Telephone: (714) 375-6604 Facsimile : (714) 375-6632 Attorneys for Defendant, PETER A. CAMPELLONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CHUDI C. IWU, Plaintiffs, v. GENESIS LENDING GROUP, INC., PETER A. CAMPELLONE, RONALD GRAVES, SARAH GRAVES, Defendants. |NO.: C07-06506-CRB (JCS) | |FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION TO AND | |PROPOSED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE | |OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE | |DATE : MARCH 02, 2009 | |NEW DATE : APRIL 06, 2009 | |TIME : 9:30 A.M. | |COURTROOM :A | |MAG. JUDGE : HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO | Subject to approval by the Court, Plaintiff, Chudi C. Iwu, and Defendant, Peter A. Campellone, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to an order 1) continuing the March 02, 2009, Settlement Conference to April 06, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A of the above-entitled Court, 2) continuing the February 13, 2009, Chambers telephone report to March 20, 2009, and, 3) continuing the February 16, 2009, Settlement Conference Statement lodging to March 23, 2009. This is the first amended stipulation and request for continuance of the March 2, 2009, Settlement Conference. -1­ FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION TO AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case 3:07-cv-06506-CRB Document 41 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Good cause exists for granting the continuance: Defense counsel will be engaged in a long-cause trial set for 9:00 a.m. on March 3, 2009, in Department C1 of the Orange County Superior Court in the case of Mayo v Chu. The trial was set before review and analysis of the Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order. Defense counsel will also be engaged in an Order to Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction set for 8:30 a.m. on March 3, 2009, in Department C32 of the Orange County Superior Court in Workspace v Robles. Defense counsel will therefore be engaged in final trial preparation for Mayo v Chu and preparation for the OSC Re Preliminary Injunction in Workspace v Robles on Monday, March 02, 2009, and will be unavailable to attend the Settlement Conference as presently noticed. Dated: February 04, 2009 LAW OFFICES RICHARD JAY BLASKEY /S/ RICHARD JAY BLASKEY _______________________________________________ RICHARD JAY BLASKEY, ESQ. - BAR NO. 89223 rjblaw@1stcounsel.com 17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5998 Telephone: (714) 375-6604 Facsimile: (714) 375-6632 Attorneys for Defendant, PETER A. CAMPELLONE Dated: February 04, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. GOLDSTEIN /S/ JEFF POLLACK _______________________________________________ BY: JEFF POLLACK, ESQ. - BAR NO. 72274 jeff@rgoldsteinlaw.com 1430 Franklin Street, 2nd Floor Oakland, CA 94812 Telephone: (510) 834-6720 Facsimile : (510) 834-5476 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CHUDI C. IWU IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED February 5, 2009 Dated: _________________. S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R -2­ FIRST AMENDED STIPULATION TO AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE A Spero ________________________________________________ seph C. Judge Jo HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ER C LI FO R NIA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?