Padilla et al v. Yoo

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING 25 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule and RESETTING Hearing Date. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 24, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 25

Filed 09/24/2008

Page 1 of 3

NATALIE L. BRIDGEMAN, State Bar No. 223717 Law Offices of Natalie L. Bridgeman, Esq. 131 Steuart Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] JONATHAN M. FREIMAN (pro hac vice) HOPE R. METCALF (pro hac vice) P.O. Box 208215 New Haven, CT 06520-8215 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Jose Padilla and Estela Lebron, Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) v. ) ) ) ) JOHN YOO, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) _____________________________________ ) JOSE PADILLA AND ESTELA LEBRON, CASE NO.: C 08-00035 JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER THEREON

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 25

Filed 09/24/2008

Page 2 of 3

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 and 7-12, both parties stipulate to this request for an order modifying the briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss set by the parties' May 5 stipulated request. In support of this stipulated request, the parties, through their respective counsel, state the following facts: 1. On May 5, 2008, this Court granted the parties' Stipulated Request for an

Order Continuing the Case Management Conference and Associated Deadlines, in which the parties agreed to certain deadlines. 2. 3. 1, 2008. 4. Counsel for Plaintiffs have begun diligently preparing their opposition to the The Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on June 2, 2008. The Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on August

Motion to Dismiss, but unexpected events, including a death in one of counsel's family, has delayed completion of the opposition. 5. Accordingly, subject to the approval of the Court, the parties stipulate to the

following modification of the schedule presented in the parties' May 5 stipulated request: a. The Plaintiffs shall respond to the Defendant's motion to dismiss on or before October 17, 2008. b. The Defendant's reply brief will be due within 30 days of the filing of the Plaintiffs' opposition.

Dated September 24, 2008

Respectfully submitted,

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 25

Filed 09/24/2008

Page 3 of 3

__________/s/_______________________ Glenn S. Greene Counsel for John Yoo

_________/s/________________________ Jonathan M. Freiman (pro hac vice) Counsel for Jose Padilla and Estela Lebron

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED The briefing schedule is amended as stipulated. The hearing is CONTINUED from December 5, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. to January 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. ___________________________________ Judge Jeffrey S. White United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Sept ____ __ 2008 Dated:_____ember_24, _____

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE