Padilla et al v. Yoo

Filing 29

ORDER DENYING 28 Stipulation Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 13, 2008. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 28

Filed 11/13/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 GREGORY G. KATSAS Assistant Attorney General 2 C. FREDERICK BECKNER III Deputy Assistant Attorney General 3 TIMOTHY P. GARREN 4 Director, Torts Branch MARY HAMPTON MASON 5 Senior Trial Counsel GLENN S. GREENE 6 SARAH WHITMAN Trial Attorneys 7 Torts Branch, Civil Division United States Department of Justice 8 P.O. Box 7146 Ben Franklin Station 9 Washington, D.C. 20044 10 Telephone:[phone] Facsimile: [phone] 11 [e-mail] 12 Attorneys for Defendant John Yoo 13 14 15 16 JOSE PADILLA AND ESTELA LEBRON, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) v. ) ) JOHN YOO, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) ) ) __________________________________________) CASE NO.: C 08-00035 JSW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER DENYING REQUEST WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties to the above captioned action,

24 through their respective counsel, stipulate to this request for an order modifying the briefing 25 schedule for Defendant John Yoo's motion to dismiss. In support of this stipulated request, the 26 parties, through their respective counsel, state the following facts: 27 28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 28

Filed 11/13/2008

Page 2 of 3

1

1.

On September 24, 2008, the Court granted the parties' Stipulated Request for an

2 Order Modifying Briefing Schedule, in which the parties agreed to certain deadlines. 3 2. Pursuant to the modified briefing schedule, the Plaintiffs responded to Defendant

4 Yoo's Motion to Dismiss on October 17, 2008. 5 3. According to the modified briefing schedule, Defendant's Yoo's Reply is due

6 November 17, 2008. 7 4. Counsel for Defendant Yoo has contacted counsel for Plaintiffs and requested that

8 the date of Yoo's Reply be moved to November 26, 2008. Counsel for Plaintiffs have agreed to 9 the request. 10 5. Accordingly, the parties have stipulated, subject to the approval of the Court, to

11 the following modification of the briefing schedule: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

a.

On or before November 26, 2008, Defendant Yoo will file a Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Yoo's Motion to Dismiss.

Case 3:08-cv-00035-JSW

Document 28

Filed 11/13/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 Dated: November 13, 2008 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. 11 /S/ 12 Glenn S. Greene Counsel for John Yoo 13 14 15 16 The stipulated request is DENIED without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for the extension of time. /S/ Jonathan M. Freiman, pro hac vice Counsel for Jose Padilla and Estela Lebron /S/ Glenn S. Greene Counsel for John Yoo Respectfully submitted,

17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 18 ___________________________________ Judge Jeffrey S. White 19 United States District Court for the Northern District of California 20 21 Dated:___N___mber______ _ ove____ 13, 2008 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE