Padilla et al v. Yoo

Filing 50

ORDER re 46 MOTION to Continue and 33 MOTION for Protective Order REQUIRING Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on February 26, 2009. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOSE PADILLA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN YOO, Defendant. / ORDER REQUIRING REPLY ON MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER No. C 08-00035 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On January 30, 2009, this Court granted Defendant's request to continue the hearing on his motion for a protective order. The Court requires that Defendant file a reply to his motion for a protective order informing the Court of the status of his position during the continuance. The reply shall be filed by no later than Monday, March 2, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 26, 2009 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?