Franco v. H&R Block Long Term Disability Insurance Plan

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees in this action. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/6/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)

Case 3:08-cv-00150-SI

Document 21

Filed 03/05/2009

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. JOSEPH M. RIMAC - State Bar No. 72381 ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, California 94115 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Defendant H & R BLOCK LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN FRICKER & MELLEN & ASSOCIATES TIMONTY J. FRICKER - State Bar No. 183309 JAMES G. MELLEN - State Bar No. 122035 KAREN CREECH - State Bar No. 168023 Tribune Tower 409 13th Street, 17th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

E -F IL IN G

SANDRA FRANCO,

) ) CASE NO. CV 08-00150 SI Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATION OF vs. ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) H & R BLOCK LONG TERM DISABILITY ) INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________ )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, H & R BLOCK LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN and SANDRA FRANCO, through their designated counsel of record herein, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees in this action. -1C A S E NO. CV 08-00150 SI

S T IP U L A T I O N OF DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE

Case 3:08-cv-00150-SI

Document 21

Filed 03/05/2009

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to local rules, this document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) plaintiff's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered. SO STIPULATED. FRICKER & MELLEN & ASSOCIATES

DATED: March 5, 2009

By:

/S/ JA M ES G. MELLEN JAMES G. MELLEN Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDRA FRANCO

RIMAC MARTIN, P.C

DATED: March 5, 2009

By:

/S/ AN N A M. MA R TIN ANNA M. MARTIN Attorneys for Defendant H & R BLOCK LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN

ORDER

SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________

________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

S T IP U L A T I O N OF DISM I S S A L W I T H PREJUDICE

-2C A S E NO. CV 08-00150 SI