Molinar v. Price et al

Filing 58

ORDER denying 57 Request filed by Armando Molinar. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/20/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

Download PDF
Molinar v. Price et al Doc. 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.08\Molinar, A1.or3.wpd IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARMANDO MOLINAR, Plaintiff(s), v. B. PRICE, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-0161 CRB (PR) ORDER (Docket # 57) On November 24, 2009, the court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claim that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety when they denied his request for permission to wear tennis shoes in the showers due to an ankle injury and he consequently fell and injured himself. Docket # 55. "Plaintiff did not file an opposition despite being advised to do so on more than on one occasion." Id. at 2. More than seven months later, plaintiff has filed a request for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that he has "uncovered discrepancies in the request for summary judgment." Docket # 57 at 1. Plaintiff's request (docket # 57) is DENIED. In order to relitigate this matter, plaintiff must show that he is entitled to vacate judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). He does not. He does not even disclose the discrepancies he has uncovered. SO ORDERED. DATED: July 20, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?