Brady et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al

Filing 128

SEALING ORDER (RE: CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SMITH) re 125 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP JEFFREY K. COMPTON, State Bar No. 142969 DARIA DUB CARLSON, State Bar No. 150628 WILLIAM A. BAIRD, State Bar No. 192675 17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380 Pacific Palisades, California 90272 Telephone: (310) 454-5900 Facsimile: (310) 454-5970 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER STEVEN ELSTER, State Bar No. 227545 785/E2 Oak Grove Road, #201 Concord, CA 94518-3617 Telephone: (925) 324-2159 Facsimile: (925) 945-1276 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH AND IVA CHIU MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LINDA E. SHOSTAK, State Bar No. 64599 JAMES E. BODDY, JR., State Bar No. 65244 KATHRYN M. DAVIS, State Bar No. 203454 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Defendant DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH, and IVA CHIU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, a limited liability partnership; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. C-08-00177-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SCOTT SMITH 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SCOTT SMITH CASE NO. C-08-00177-SI sf-2803554 PUBLIC VERSION 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rules 7-12 and 79-5, and the Court's Standing Order, Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their respective counsel, submit the following stipulation and [proposed] order granting Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP ("Defendant") leave to file permanently under seal the materials described below. WHEREAS, in the course of the discovery the parties have produced and disclosed confidential, proprietary, and other private information related to the parties, as well as Defendant's clients, designated "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" pursuant to the parties' Stipulated Protective Order signed by the Court on March 10, 2009, and filed in the above captioned action on March 11, 2009 ("Designated Produced Materials"), for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted; WHEREAS, the parties agree that confidential, proprietary, and other private information related to the parties, as well as Defendant's clients, will also be included in or discussed in the parties filings on the Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification ("Designated Motion Materials"); WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Designated Produced Materials and Designated Motion Materials consist of Defendant's proprietary employee training materials, proprietary guidance for conducting audits, proprietary policies, confidential employee personnel and pay data, and confidential and proprietary audit work papers, as well as the confidential and proprietary information of Defendant's clients. WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Designated Produced Materials, including all information derived from the Designated Produced Materials, and the Designated Motion Materials should be filed permanently under seal on the ground that good cause exists to prevent the disclosure of this confidential, proprietary, and financial information. See, e.g., In re Adobe Systems Inc. Securities Litigation, 141 F.R.D. 155, 158 (N.D. Cal. 1992) (good cause exists when disclosure of proprietary or financial information would put a company as a competitive disadvantage); Hirschfeld v. Stone, 193 F.R.D. 175, 187 (S.D. N.Y. 2000) ("disclosure of confidential information is the quintessential type of irreparable herm that cannot be compensated STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SMITH CASE NO. C-08-00177-SI sf-2803554 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 or undone by money damages); Encyclopedia Brown Prod., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F. Supp 2d 606, 614 (S.D. N.Y. 1998) (that party would be irreparably harmed by disclosure of confidential business information supported sealing, even though documents dealt with business information dating back several years). NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval, that the following materials/information, attached hereto, be filed permanently under seal: Corrected Declaration Of Scott Smith In Support Of Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP's Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Dated: February 16, 2010 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS By: /s/William A. Baird WILLIAM A BAIRD JEFFREY K. COMPTON Markun Zusman & Compton LLP STEVE ELSTER Law Office of Steve Elster Dated: February 16, 2010 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS By: /s/Linda E. Shostak LINDA E. SHOSTAK JAMES E. BODDY, JR. Morrison & Foerster LLP ECF CERTIFICATION I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from each of the signatories within the e-filed document. Dated: February 16, 2010 By: /s/Linda E. Shostak LINDA E. SHOSTAK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SMITH CASE NO. C-08-00177-SI sf-2803554 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ____________, 2010 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SMITH CASE NO. C-08-00177-SI sf-2803554 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?