Brady et al v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al

Filing 73

ORDER extending briefing schedule/continuing cmc to 3/12/10 @ 3 p.m. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72 Filed11/19/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP JEFFREY K. COMPTON, State Bar No. 142969 DARIA DUB CARLSON, State Bar No. 150628 WILLIAM A. BAIRD, State Bar No. 192675 17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380 Pacific Palisades, California 90272 Telephone: (310) 454-5900 Facsimile: (310) 454-5970 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER STEVEN ELSTER, State Bar No. 227545 785/E2 Oak Grove Road, #201 Concord, CA 94518-3617 Telephone: (925) 324-2159 Facsimile: (925) 945-1276 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH AND IVA CHIU MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LINDA E. SHOSTAK, State Bar No. 64599 JAMES E. BODDY, JR., State Bar No. 65244 KATHRYN M. DAVIS, State Bar No. 203454 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415)268-7000 Facsimile: (415)268-7522 Attorneys for Defendant, DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH, and IVA CHIU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, a limited liability partnership; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants 1 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C-08-00177 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72 Filed11/19/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rules 16 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their respective counsel, submit the following stipulation and [proposed] order regarding the class certification schedule and other discovery dates in this action. WHEREAS, the current class certification schedule provides that Plaintiffs shall file a motion for class certification no later than November 23, 2009; Defendant shall file an opposition brief no later than December 23, 2009; Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief no later than January 27, 2009; and the hearing on certification shall take place on February 19, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties recently agreed to slightly modify the schedule to accommodate subsequently arising scheduling conflicts; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' class certification brief shall be filed no later than November 25, 2009; Defendant's opposition brief shall be filed no later than December 24, 2009; Plaintiffs' reply brief shall be filed no later than January 28, 2010; and the class certification hearing shall remain on February 19, 2010 or any date thereafter as is convenient for the Court; 2. For the Case Management Conference presently set for March 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. to be rescheduled to March 12, 2010 or any date as is convenient for the Court. 2 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72 Filed11/19/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS DATE: November 19, 2009 By: _/s/ William A. Baird______ WILLIAM A. BAIRD JEFFREY K. COMPTON Markun Zusman & Compton LLP STEVE ELSTER Law Office of Steve Elster COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS DATE: November 19, 2009 By: __/s/ Kathryn M. Davis____ LINDA E. SHOSTACK JAMES E. BODDY, JR. Morrison & Foerster LLP ECF CERTIFICATION I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from each of the signatories within the e-filed document. By: _/s/ William A. Baird______ William A. Baird DATE: November 19, 2009 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ________________ ____________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 3 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72-1 Filed11/19/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP JEFFREY K. COMPTON, State Bar No. 142969 DARIA DUB CARLSON, State Bar No. 150628 WILLIAM A. BAIRD, State Bar No. 192675 17383 Sunset Boulevard, Suite A380 Pacific Palisades, California 90272 Telephone: (310) 454-5900 Facsimile: (310) 454-5970 LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER STEVEN ELSTER, State Bar No. 227545 785/E2 Oak Grove Road, #201 Concord, CA 94518-3617 Telephone: (925) 324-2159 Facsimile: (925) 945-1276 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH AND IVA CHIU MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LINDA E. SHOSTAK, State Bar No. 64599 JAMES E. BODDY, JR., State Bar No. 65244 KATHRYN M. DAVIS, State Bar No. 203454 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415)268-7000 Facsimile: (415)268-7522 Attorneys for Defendant, DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES BRADY, SARAH CAVANAGH, and IVA CHIU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, a limited liability partnership; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants 1 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: C-08-00177 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72-1 Filed11/19/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rules 16 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their respective counsel, submit the following stipulation and [proposed] order regarding the class certification schedule and other discovery dates in this action. WHEREAS, the current class certification schedule provides that Plaintiffs shall file a motion for class certification no later than November 23, 2009; Defendant shall file an opposition brief no later than December 23, 2009; Plaintiffs shall file a reply brief no later than January 27, 2009; and the hearing on certification shall take place on February 19, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties recently agreed to slightly modify the schedule to accommodate subsequently arising scheduling conflicts; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, as follows: 1. Plaintiffs' class certification brief shall be filed no later than November 25, 2009; Defendant's opposition brief shall be filed no later than December 24, 2009; Plaintiffs' reply brief shall be filed no later than January 28, 2010; and the class certification hearing shall remain on February 19, 2010 or any date thereafter as is convenient for the Court; 2. For the Case Management Conference presently set for March 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. to be rescheduled to March 12, 2010 or any date as is convenient for the Court. 2 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI Case3:08-cv-00177-SI Document72-1 Filed11/19/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS DATE: November 19, 2009 By: _/s/ William A. Baird______ WILLIAM A. BAIRD JEFFREY K. COMPTON Markun Zusman & Compton LLP STEVE ELSTER Law Office of Steve Elster COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS DATE: November 19, 2009 By: __/s/ Kathryn M. Davis____ LINDA E. SHOSTACK JAMES E. BODDY, JR. Morrison & Foerster LLP ECF CERTIFICATION I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from each of the signatories within the e-filed document. By: _/s/ William A. Baird______ William A. Baird DATE: November 19, 2009 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ________________ ____________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court Judge 3 Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Class Certification Schedule Case. No. 3:08-Cv-00177-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?