Stonebrae LP v. Toll Bros Inc et al

Filing 159

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 158 Stipulation filed by Toll Bros Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/25/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN, LLP

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP Donald J. Putterman (SBN 90822) E-mail: [e-mail] Christopher J. McNamara (SBN 209205) E-mail: [e-mail] Margaret A. Ziemianek (SBN 233418) E-Mail: [e-mail] 101 California Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] TIMOTHY J. HOBAN (SBN 192461) Regional Counsel for Toll Bros., Inc. E-mail: [e-mail] 725 Town & Country Road, Suite 500 Orange, California 92868 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant TOLL BROS, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

10 11
101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STONEBRAE L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff, v s. TOLL BROS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, TOLL BROTHERS, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES 1 through 15, inclusive, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims.

Case No. 08-cv-00221 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON STONEBRAE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Honorable Edward M. Chen Courtroom C, 15th Floor

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing Date; Case No. 08-cv-00221 EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN, LLP 101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

STIPULATION Whereas, on February 16, 2010, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Stonebrae L.P. ("Stonebrae") filed a Motion to Dismiss Toll's Sixth Counterclaim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which is set to be heard on March 31, 2010; Whereas, on February 24, 2010, Stonebrae filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which, among other things, seeks partial summary judgment on Toll's Sixth Counterclaim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; Whereas, on February 25, 2010, the Court continued on its own motion the hearing date on Stonebrae's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to April 21, 2010, and set the dates for the opposition and reply briefs for March 31, 2010 and April 7, 2010, respectively; and Whereas, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing date on Stonebrae's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to May 12, 2010, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard; The parties hereby stipulate to the following: 1. The hearing on Stonebrae's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be reset

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

for May 12, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard; 2. 3. Toll's opposition shall be due 21 days before the reset hearing date; and Stonebrae's reply shall be due 14 days before the reset hearing date. KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP By: /S/ Christopher J. McNamara Christopher J. McNamara Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant TOLL BROS, INC.

DATED: March 19, 2010.

DATED: March 19, 2010.

SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C. By: /S/ Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant STONEBRAE L.P. 1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing Date; Case No. 08-cv-00221 EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN, LLP 101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing on Stonebrae's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be reset

3: __ p.m. 12, 2010 for May _______________________ at _________00 _______;
2. 3. Toll's opposition shall be due 21 days before the reset hearing date; and Stonebrae's reply shall be due 14 days before the reset hearing date.

3/25/10 DATED: _______________
By: ___________________________________ S The HonorableS DIarTRICTen E Edw d M. Ch

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Hearing Date; Case No. 08-cv-00221 EMC

UNIT ED

S

T TA

C

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2

A

C

LI

FO

dw Judge E

ard M.

Chen

R NIA

ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO

RT U O

NO

RT

H