Watkins v. ShoreTel, Inc. et al

Filing 60

ORDER Granting re 59 Stipulation Extending Time For Defendants to Respond to Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, filed by Edwin J. Basart, Kenneth D. Denman, Gary J. Daichendt, Charles D. Kissner, Michael E. Healy, Thomas van Overbeek, Edward F. Thompson, ShoreTel, Inc., John W. Combs. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/20/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) [e-mail] DEAN S. KRISTY (CSB NO. 157646) [e-mail] JENNIFER L. KELLY (CSB NO. 193416) [e-mail] LESLIE KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. C-08-00271-CRB In re SHORETEL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2009, Plaintiffs Loren Swanson and Art Landesman (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed their Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "SACC") against Defendants ShoreTel, Inc. ("ShoreTel"); John W. Combs, Michael E. Healy, Edwin J. Basart, Gary J. Daichendt, Thomas Van Overbeek, Kenneth D. Denman, Charles D. Kissner, and Edward Thompson (the "Individual Defendants"); and Lehman Brothers Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities (the "Underwriter Defendants") (collectively, "Defendants");

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

WHEREAS, absent an extension Defendants' deadline for responding to the SACC is March 19, 2009; WHEREAS, this action is now stayed as to Lehman Brothers Inc. as a result of its liquidation under the Securities Investor Protection Act; WHEREAS, the remaining parties have discussed and agreed to extend Defendants' deadline for responding to the SACC by 60 days from the date it was filed; ACCORDINGLY, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that the deadline for Defendants to respond to the SACC is May 1, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 13, 2009 FENWICK & WEST LLP

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

By:/s/ Jennifer L. Kelly Jennifer L. Kelly Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson Dated: March 13, 2009 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By:/s/ Charlene S. Shimada Charlene S. Shimada Attorneys for Defendant J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Dated: March 13, 2009 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

By:/s/ Peter E. Borkon Peter E. Borkon Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: March ___, 2009 By:

UNIT ED

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer D United States District DEREJudge OR Court

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

A

C

LI

FO

harles Judge C

R. Brey

er

R NIA

IT IS S

O

NO

RT
H

1 2 3 4 5

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Jennifer L. Kelly, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & W E S T LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 13th day of March, 2009, at San Francisco, California. FENWICK & WEST LLP

By:

/s/ Jennifer L. Kelly Jennifer L. Kelly

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4

Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson

CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB