Watkins v. ShoreTel, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER further extending time for defendants to respond re 61 Stipulation, filed by Edwin J. Basart, Kenneth D. Denman, Gary J. Daichendt, Charles D. Kissner, Michael E. Healy, Thomas van Overbeek, Edward F. Thompson, ShoreTel, Inc., John W. Combs. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/13/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

SUSAN S. MUCK (CSB NO. 126930) [e-mail] DEAN S. KRISTY (CSB NO. 157646) [e-mail] JENNIFER L. KELLY (CSB NO. 193416) [e-mail] LESLIE KRAMER (CSB NO. 253313) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re SHORETEL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. C-08-00271-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2009, Plaintiffs Loren Swanson and Art Landesman (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed their Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "SACC") against Defendants ShoreTel, Inc. ("ShoreTel"); John W. Combs, Michael E. Healy, Edwin J. Basart, Gary J. Daichendt, Thomas Van Overbeek, Kenneth D. Denman, Charles D. Kissner, and Edward Thompson (the "Individual Defendants"); and Lehman Brothers Inc. and

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. (the "Underwriter Defendants") (collectively, "Defendants"); WHEREAS, this action is stayed as to Lehman Brothers Inc. as a result of its liquidation under the Securities Investor Protection Act; WHEREAS, pursuant to the remaining parties' stipulation, approved by this Court on March 23, 2009, Defendants' current deadline for responding to the SACC is May 1, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties have discussed and agreed to further extend Defendants' deadline for responding to the SACC to June 1, 2009; ACCORDINGLY, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate that the new deadline for Defendants to respond to the SACC is June 1, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 8, 2009 FENWICK & WEST LLP

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

By:/s/ Jennifer L. Kelly Jennifer L. Kelly Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson Dated: April 8, 2009 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By:/s/ Charlene S. Shimada Charlene S. Shimada Attorneys for Defendant J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Dated: April 8, 2009 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

By:/s/ Peter E. Borkon Peter E. Borkon Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class

CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
FENWICK & WEST LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: April ___, 2009 By:

The Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District CourtRED RDE Judge

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 CASE NO. C-08-00271-CRB

A

C

LI

FO

har Judge C

les R. B

reyer

R NIA

IT IS S

OO

NO

RT

H