Watkins v. ShoreTel, Inc. et al

Filing 97

ORDER setting case schdule re 96 Stipulation filed by Art Landesman, Loren Swanson. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/7/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Kim E. Miller (178370) Melissa R. Clark, pro hac vice KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 500 5th Avenue, Suite 1810 New York, NY 10110 Telephone: (212) 696-3730 Facsimile: (504) 455-1498 Lewis S. Kahn, pro hac vice Paul S. Balanon, pro hac vice Sarah C. Boone, pro hac vice KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2150 New Orleans, LA 70130 Telephone: (504) 455-1400 Facsimile: (504) 455-1498 Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class Reed R. Kathrein (139304) Peter E. Borkon (212596) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 725-3000 Facsimile: (510) 725-3001 Liaison Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re SHORETEL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. C-08-00271-CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs Loren Swanson and Art Landesman (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs, Michael E. Healy, Edwin J. Basart, Mark F. Bregman, Gary J. Daichendt, Thomas Van Overbeek, Kenneth D. Denman, Charles D. Kissner, and Edward Thompson; and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (collectively, "Defendants") have met and conferred regarding the case schedule; WHEREAS, the action is stayed as to Defendant Lehman Brothers Inc. as a result of its liquidation under the Securities Investor Protection Act; WHEREAS, on December 4, 2009, in anticipation of a Case Management Conference scheduled for the following week, the parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement and [Proposed] Order that included deadlines in 2011; WHEREAS, on December 11, 2009, the Court convened the Case Management Conference, but advised the parties to confer further on scheduling to avoid including any 2011 dates; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred to discuss the Court's concerns and they have agreed upon a revised case schedule; THEREFORE, IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, subject to the Court's approval, that the following Proposed Schedule shall govern this case: ACTION Class Certification DEADLINE OR DUE DATE Motion: April 15, 2010 Opposition: May 28, 2010 Reply: June 11, 2010 Amendment of Pleadings to Add Parties, Claims, or Defenses Fact Discovery Ends Deadline to File Motion(s) to Compel Fact Discovery April 1, 2010 June 30, 2010 July 10, 2010 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The party with the burden of proof discloses expert report(s) and identity of expert(s) The party without the burden of proof discloses rebuttal expert report(s) and identity of expert(s) Expert Discovery Ends Deadline to File Motion(s) to Compel Expert Discovery Dispositive Motions and Daubert/Kumho Motions July 7, 2010 July 27, 2010 August 10, 2010 August 18, 2010 Motion: September 15, 2010 Opposition: October 15, 2010 Reply: November 1, 2010 Pre-Trial Conference Trial: Plaintiffs have requested a jury trial, and the parties anticipate that a trial of this matter will last approximately three weeks. November 1, 2010 November 4, 2010 December 1, 2010, subject to the Court's schedule December 16, 2010 Dated: January 4, 2010 KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC /s/ Kim E. Miller Kim E. Miller Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class Dated: January 4, 2010 FENWICK & WEST LLP /s/ Catherine Kevane Catherine Kevane Attorneys for Defendants ShoreTel, Inc.; John W. Combs; Michael E. Healy; Edwin J. Basart; Mark F. Bregman; Gary J. Daichendt; Thomas Van Overbeek; Kenneth D. Denman; Charles D. Kissner; and Edward F. Thompson -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 4, 2010 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP /s/ Charlene S. Shimada Charlene S. Shimada Attorneys for Defendant J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Jan. 7, 2010 S DISTRICT TE C TA The Honorable Charles R. Breyer RT U O UNIT ED United States District Court Judge S ER N F D IS T IC T O R -4- A C LI FO harles Judge C R. Brey er R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Kim E. Miller, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document was obtained from the other signatories noted above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 4th day of January 2010, in New York, New York. /s/ Kim E. Miller Kim E. Miller -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?