Lymburner v. U.S. Financial Funds, Inc.

Filing 83

ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on April 14, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // 2. 3. v. U.S. FINANCIAL FUNDING, INC., Defendant. / DIAN C. LYMBURNER, Plaintiff, No. C-08-00325 EDL ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA On April 14, 2009, the Court held a further case management conference in this case. As stated at the conference, the Court orders that: 1. The parties shall meet and confer regarding amendment of the complaint with respect to the remedies available against the sole remaining Defendant U.S. Financial Funding, or other issues, if any, affected by the elimination of other Defendants. No later than May 1, 2009, Plaintiff shall file either a stipulation and amended complaint or a party should file another appropriate motion or stipulation addressing these issues. The last day to hear a motion for class certification is November 3, 2009. A further case management conference is scheduled for June 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file a joint further case management conference statement no later than June 9, 2009. At the June 16, 2009 conference, the Court intends to set further pretrial and trial dates. In addition, the parties should be prepared to discuss whether referral for a settlement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 conference with a magistrate judge would be appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 14, 2009 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?