Randall v. Roto-Rooter Services Company

Filing 17

ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DAVID E. RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY, and DOES 120, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER RE REQUEST TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE No. C 08-00354 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation and order for extension of the discovery deadline. Good cause has not been shown to alter the existing case deadlines. The request to extend the discovery deadline is therefore DENIED, without prejudice. If the parties wish to arrange for depositions and other discovery to proceed beyond the cutoff date by mutual agreement, without Court enforcement or involvement, the parties may do so. All case deadlines, however, remain as set in the first amended case management scheduling order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2008 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court For the Northern District of California 28 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?