Center for Food Safety et al v. Connor et al

Filing 656

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al. 10 Plaintiffs, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 No. C 08-00484 JSW v. THOMAS J. VILSACK, et al. 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. / 14 15 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. 16 Laporte’s Report and Recommendations (the “First Report” and “Second Report,” 17 respectively), in which she recommends that this Court grant motion for attorneys’ fees and 18 costs filed by Plaintiffs, but reduce the requested attorneys’ fees by certain amounts. 19 Defendants filed objections to both Reports. The Court has considered Defendant’s objections 20 and concludes that no response is necessary. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 72-1(a). 21 The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Laporte’s First Report and Second Report 22 are correct, well-reasoned and thorough and adopts her determination that Plaintiffs’s motion 23 for attorneys’ fees and costs should be granted, with certain deductions. Accordingly, the Court 24 HEREBY ADOPTS her Reports and Recommendations in every respect and GRANTS 25 Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs as modified for the reasons set forth in both 26 Reports. Therefore, the Court reduces Plaintiffs’ amount of requested attorneys’ fees by 27 /// 28 /// 1 $175,689. Plaintiffs are HEREBY AWARDED $2,638,367.00 in attorneys’ fees and 2 $66,552,59 in costs. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: December 15, 2011 5 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?