Center for Food Safety et al v. Connor et al
Filing
656
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/15/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al.
10
Plaintiffs,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
No. C 08-00484 JSW
v.
THOMAS J. VILSACK, et al.
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
/
14
15
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D.
16
Laporte’s Report and Recommendations (the “First Report” and “Second Report,”
17
respectively), in which she recommends that this Court grant motion for attorneys’ fees and
18
costs filed by Plaintiffs, but reduce the requested attorneys’ fees by certain amounts.
19
Defendants filed objections to both Reports. The Court has considered Defendant’s objections
20
and concludes that no response is necessary. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 72-1(a).
21
The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Laporte’s First Report and Second Report
22
are correct, well-reasoned and thorough and adopts her determination that Plaintiffs’s motion
23
for attorneys’ fees and costs should be granted, with certain deductions. Accordingly, the Court
24
HEREBY ADOPTS her Reports and Recommendations in every respect and GRANTS
25
Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs as modified for the reasons set forth in both
26
Reports. Therefore, the Court reduces Plaintiffs’ amount of requested attorneys’ fees by
27
///
28
///
1
$175,689. Plaintiffs are HEREBY AWARDED $2,638,367.00 in attorneys’ fees and
2
$66,552,59 in costs.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: December 15, 2011
5
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?