Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company v. Wong et al

Filing 54

ORDER re 53 Stipulation filed by Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/11/08. Case not closed pending Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against John Wong(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-00488-EMC Document 53 Filed 12/10/2008 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gary R. Selvin, State Bar No. 112030 Joshua S. Leach, State Bar No. 209061 SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP 505 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1811 Facsimile: (510) 465-8976 E-mail: gselvin@selvinwraith.com jleach@selvinwraith.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA QUANTA SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOHN B. WONG dba BOXER GROUP; JILL PEASLEY, a California resident; CHRIS LYNCH, a California resident; and MICHAEL FONTANELLO, a California resident, Defendants. CASE NO.: 3:08-CV-00488-EMC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ; ORDER Assigned to Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen Complaint Filed: January 23, 2008 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO.: 3:08-CV-00488-EMC Case 3:08-cv-00488-EMC Document 53 Filed 12/10/2008 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 58786.doc These parties having settled all issues, pursuant to Rule 41, HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff to this action, Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Company and defendants to this action, Jill Peasley, Chris Lynch and Michalel Fontanello, and through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 10, 2008 SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP By: /s/ Gary R. Selvin Joshua S. Leach Attorneys for Plaintiff Quanta Capitol Holdings, Ltd. Dated: December 10, 2008 ELLIOT & ELLIOT By: /s/ Greg Meisenhelder John W. Elliot Attorneys for Defendants Jill Peasely, Christopher Lynch and Michael Fontanello SO ORDERED. December 11, 2008 Dated:___________________ UNIT ED ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 CASE NO.: 3:08-CV-00488-EMC A C LI FO dwar Judge E d M. Ch en R NIA ____________________________________ D RDERE Northern S SO OCourt Judge I District I Edward M. Chen JudgeT S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H Case 3:08-cv-00488-EMC Document 53 Filed 12/10/2008 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Re: Court: Action No. Quanta Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. John B. Wong dba Boxer Group, et al. U.S.D.C., Northern Division 3:08-cv-00488-EMC PROOF OF SERVICE I declare that I am over the age of 18, am not a party to the above-entitled action, and am an employee of Selvin Wraith Halman LLP whose business address is 505 14th Street, Suite 1200, Oakland, Alameda County, California 94612. On December 10, 2008, I served the following document(s): Stipulation to Dismiss By ELECTRONIC FILE TRANSFER TO ECF FILE & SERVE: By transmitting a true copy the document(s) listed above for service on all parties in this case pursuant to applicable statutes, local rules and/or order of this Court. Mr. John W. Elliott Elliott & Elliott Thomas A. Elliot Greg M. Meisenhelder 225 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 950 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone No.: (408) 280-2160 Fax No.: (408) 277-0804 Email: Mr. John B. Wong Boxer Group Post Office Box 590603 San Francisco, CA 94159 Telephone No.: (415) 933-8860 Fax No.: Email: johnbwong@boxergroup.com Attorneys for Defendants: JILL PEASLEY, CHRISTOPHER LYNCH, and MICHAEL FONTANELLO Attorneys for: In Pro Per I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: December 10, 2008 /s/ Kathryn Shahin STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 2 CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-00488-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?