Gray et al v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area et al
Filing
151
ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 6/21/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 08-00722 EDL
LORI GRAY, et al.
ORDER REGARDING SCOPE OF
STIPULATION
v.
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL
RECREATIONAL AREA, et al.
Defendants.
/
At the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2012, this Court ordered the
19
parties to meet and confer to provide the Court with a stipulation regarding the named Plaintiffs’
20
visits to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (“GGNRA”). In letters dated June 14 and June
21
15, 2012, the parties informed the Court of a disagreement about the scope of the stipulation the
22
Court had ordered. Defendants seek a stipulation concerning every place the named Plaintiffs have
23
visited, planned to visit or were deterred from visiting; every program or activity the named
24
Plaintiffs participated in, planned to participate in or were deterred from participating in; and every
25
policy, practice or procedure that has specifically impacted a named Plaintiff. Such a stipulation
26
goes beyond what the Court ordered. The parties should provide the Court with a stipulation
27
regarding the places within the GGNRA that the named Plaintiffs have actually visited, or had a
28
plan to visit but were deterred from visiting due to their knowledge of barriers and the like. See
1
Transcript at 18.
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: June 21, 2012
5
6
7
8
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?