Gray et al v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area et al

Filing 181

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS AS MODIFIED. Cross Motions due by 9/21/2012. Responses to Pltf's MSJ due by 9/21/2012. Replies due to Pltf's MSJ by 10/19/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 9/6/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LAURENCE PARADIS (CA BAR NO. 122336) RONALD ELSBERRY (CA BAR NO. 130880) STUART SEABORN (CA BAR NO. 198590) CHRISTINE CHUANG (CA BAR NO. 257214) Disability Rights Advocates 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, California 94704-1204 Telephone: (510) 665-8644 Facsimile: (510) 665-8511 TTY: (510) 665-8716 Email: general@dralegal.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs STUART F. DELERY Acting Assistant Attorney General STUART A. LICHT Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch United States Department of Justice, Civil Division JESSE Z. GRAUMAN (VA BAR NO. 76782) LEAH J. BRESSACK (MA BAR NO. 681355) BONNIE J. PROBER (NY BAR NO. 4216461) BRIAN G. KENNEDY (DC BAR NO. 228726) JONATHAN G. COOPER (DC BAR NO. 999764) JOHN K. THEIS (IL BAR NO. 6287528) Trial attorneys, United States Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 514-2849 Fax: (202) 305-8517 Email: jesse.z.grauman@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 22 LORI GRAY, et al., Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL) Plaintiffs, 23 v. 24 25 26 27 28 GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, et al., Defendants. STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS AS MODIFIED Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate to seek an extension of ten (10) 1 2 days, until and including September 21, 2012, for Defendants to file their combined opposition cross-motion for summary judgment, and 3 4 corresponding extensions to the remaining two briefing deadlines. This stipulation is 5 accompanied by a proposed order and by the Declaration of Jesse Z. Grauman ( 6 Decl. 7 information required by Local Civil Rule 6-2(a). rauman extensions and provides the other 8 On April 5, 2012, the Court ordered that dispositive motions be served and filed by 9 August 14, 2012, that an opposition and a cross-motion for summary judgment be filed by 10 September 11, 2012, that a combined cross-opposition and reply be filed on October 9, 2012, and 11 that a reply to the cross-motion be filed on November 6, 2012. (ECF No. 138 at 3.)1 On August 12 14, 2012, Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 171.) The parties stipulate to request an extension of ten days for Defendants to file their 13 14 combined opposition and cross-motion, until and including September 21, 2012, and 15 corresponding ten-day extensions to the remaining two briefing deadlines. The grounds for the 16 stipulated request are that unanticipated impediments to the completion of the briefs and 17 supporting declarations recently have arisen for two of Defendants and one of experts. Bonnie Prober, lead counsel for Defendants, is expecting a child on 18 19 September 27, 2012, and, due to complications related to her pregnancy and physician-ordered 20 restrictions, unexpectedly has been required to miss significant periods of work. Grauman Decl. 21 ¶ 5. Additionally, over the Labor Day weekend, 22 away. Id. ¶ 7. Mr. Kennedy, who will be serving 23 will be traveling to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for the funeral, and will be unable to work on this 24 matter for a minimum of two days this week. Id. ¶¶ 6-7. In addition, Kim Blackseth, family passed 25 26 27 28 1 agreed that Plaintiffs would file their motion on August 14 and their combined opposition and reply on October 9, and that Defendants would file their combined opposition and cross-motion on September 11 and their reply on November 6. The Court later clarified this sequence on July 24, 2012. (ECF No. 167.) Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL) STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS 1 1 access expert, has been hospitalized for an extended period and has therefore been 2 unavailable to assist in the preparation of papers in accordance with the current schedule.2 Id. 3 ¶ 8. Finally, Defendants are requesting ten (10) days, rather than a shorter period of time, due to 4 the religious holiday of Rosh Hashanah, which will take place on September 17-18; four of expect to be out of the office for either or both of those days due to their 5 6 observance of the holiday. Id. ¶ 10 & n.1.3 For the above reasons, the parties stipulate to request an extension for Defendants to file 7 8 their opposition and cross-motion from September 11, 2012 until September 21, 2012. To 9 accommodate the remaining deadlines for the completion of summary judgment briefing, the 10 parties stipulate to request 11 currently October 9, 2012, be extended to October 19, 2012, and that the deadline for ntly November 6, 2012, be extended to November 16, 2012. The 12 13 parties do not seek to modify the date for the hearing , which is currently 14 scheduled for December 4, 2012, unless of course the Court wishes to extend that hearing date in 15 light of the modified briefing schedule. 16 This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, and is not 17 expected materially to affect the litigation schedule or the disposition, by way of motion or trial, 18 of this action. Thus, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby 19 respectfully request that the Court enter the Proposed Order submitted herewith. 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 DATED: September 5, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 22 23 /S/ Jesse Z. Grauman Jesse Z. Grauman 24 25 26 27 28 2 ut of the office for trial in another matter, Deron Sch. of N.J. v. USDA, No. 09-3477 (D.N.J.), beginning on September 10, 2012. Grauman Decl. ¶ 9. 3 These attorneys will also be observing the holiday of Yom Kippur on September 26, 2012; however, because this date is beyond the period of time that is the subject of the instant motion, Defendants do not foresee any scheduling complications related to this holiday. Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL) STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS 2 Attorney for Defendants 1 2 3 DATED: September 5, 2012 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 4 5 6 /S/ Ronald Ellsberry Ronald Elsberry Attorney for Plaintiffs 7 8 I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL) STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS 3 (Proposed) ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 Upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the deadlines for the parties remaining summary judgment briefs be extended as follows: 1) judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment by Friday, September 21, 2012; 2) Plaintiffs will file their combined reply and cross-opposition by Friday, October 19, 7 2012; and 8 9 3) Defendants will file their reply by November 16, 2012. 4) Hearing on the motions shall be continued to December 17, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 6 Dated: September _____, 2012 18 R NIA FO ER H 17 RT 16 NO 15 LI 14 D RDERE OO ___________________________________ IT IS S FIED ELIZABETH D. ODI S M LAPORTE A United States Magistrate Judge porte h D. La Elizabet Judge A 13 UNIT ED 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 10 N D IS T IC T R OF C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL) STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?