Gray et al v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area et al
Filing
181
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS AS MODIFIED. Cross Motions due by 9/21/2012. Responses to Pltf's MSJ due by 9/21/2012. Replies due to Pltf's MSJ by 10/19/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/17/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 9/6/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
LAURENCE PARADIS (CA BAR NO. 122336)
RONALD ELSBERRY (CA BAR NO. 130880)
STUART SEABORN (CA BAR NO. 198590)
CHRISTINE CHUANG (CA BAR NO. 257214)
Disability Rights Advocates
2001 Center Street, Third Floor
Berkeley, California 94704-1204
Telephone: (510) 665-8644
Facsimile: (510) 665-8511
TTY: (510) 665-8716
Email: general@dralegal.org
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
STUART A. LICHT
Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch
United States Department of Justice, Civil Division
JESSE Z. GRAUMAN (VA BAR NO. 76782)
LEAH J. BRESSACK (MA BAR NO. 681355)
BONNIE J. PROBER (NY BAR NO. 4216461)
BRIAN G. KENNEDY (DC BAR NO. 228726)
JONATHAN G. COOPER (DC BAR NO. 999764)
JOHN K. THEIS (IL BAR NO. 6287528)
Trial attorneys, United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: (202) 514-2849
Fax: (202) 305-8517
Email: jesse.z.grauman@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
21
22
LORI GRAY, et al.,
Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL)
Plaintiffs,
23
v.
24
25
26
27
28
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL
RECREATION AREA, et al.,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO
EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS
AS MODIFIED
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate to seek an extension of ten (10)
1
2
days, until and including September 21, 2012, for Defendants to file their combined opposition
cross-motion for summary judgment, and
3
4
corresponding extensions to the remaining two briefing deadlines. This stipulation is
5
accompanied by a proposed order and by the Declaration of Jesse Z. Grauman (
6
Decl.
7
information required by Local Civil Rule 6-2(a).
rauman
extensions and provides the other
8
On April 5, 2012, the Court ordered that dispositive motions be served and filed by
9
August 14, 2012, that an opposition and a cross-motion for summary judgment be filed by
10
September 11, 2012, that a combined cross-opposition and reply be filed on October 9, 2012, and
11
that a reply to the cross-motion be filed on November 6, 2012. (ECF No. 138 at 3.)1 On August
12
14, 2012, Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. (ECF No. 171.)
The parties stipulate to request an extension of ten days for Defendants to file their
13
14
combined opposition and cross-motion, until and including September 21, 2012, and
15
corresponding ten-day extensions to the remaining two briefing deadlines. The grounds for the
16
stipulated request are that unanticipated impediments to the completion of the briefs and
17
supporting declarations recently have arisen for two of Defendants
and one of
experts. Bonnie Prober, lead counsel for Defendants, is expecting a child on
18
19
September 27, 2012, and, due to complications related to her pregnancy and physician-ordered
20
restrictions, unexpectedly has been required to miss significant periods of work. Grauman Decl.
21
¶ 5. Additionally, over the Labor Day weekend,
22
away. Id. ¶ 7. Mr. Kennedy, who will be serving
23
will be traveling to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for the funeral, and will be unable to work on this
24
matter for a minimum of two days this week. Id. ¶¶ 6-7. In addition, Kim Blackseth,
family passed
25
26
27
28
1
agreed that Plaintiffs would file their motion on August 14 and their combined opposition and reply on October 9,
and that Defendants would file their combined opposition and cross-motion on September 11 and their reply on
November 6. The Court later clarified this sequence on July 24, 2012. (ECF No. 167.)
Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL)
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS
1
1
access expert, has been hospitalized for an extended period and has therefore been
2
unavailable to assist in the preparation of papers in accordance with the current schedule.2 Id.
3
¶ 8. Finally, Defendants are requesting ten (10) days, rather than a shorter period of time, due to
4
the religious holiday of Rosh Hashanah, which will take place on September 17-18; four of
expect to be out of the office for either or both of those days due to their
5
6
observance of the holiday. Id. ¶ 10 & n.1.3
For the above reasons, the parties stipulate to request an extension for Defendants to file
7
8
their opposition and cross-motion from September 11, 2012 until September 21, 2012. To
9
accommodate the remaining deadlines for the completion of summary judgment briefing, the
10
parties stipulate to request
11
currently October 9, 2012, be extended to October 19, 2012, and that the deadline for
ntly November 6, 2012, be extended to November 16, 2012. The
12
13
parties do not seek to modify the date for the hearing
, which is currently
14
scheduled for December 4, 2012, unless of course the Court wishes to extend that hearing date in
15
light of the modified briefing schedule.
16
This stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay, and is not
17
expected materially to affect the litigation schedule or the disposition, by way of motion or trial,
18
of this action. Thus, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby
19
respectfully request that the Court enter the Proposed Order submitted herewith.
20
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
DATED: September 5, 2012
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
22
23
/S/ Jesse Z. Grauman
Jesse Z. Grauman
24
25
26
27
28
2
ut of the office for trial in another matter,
Deron Sch. of N.J. v. USDA, No. 09-3477 (D.N.J.), beginning on September 10, 2012. Grauman Decl. ¶ 9.
3
These attorneys will also be observing the holiday of Yom Kippur on September 26, 2012; however, because this
date is beyond the period of time that is the subject of the instant motion, Defendants do not foresee any scheduling
complications related to this holiday.
Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL)
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS
2
Attorney for Defendants
1
2
3
DATED: September 5, 2012
DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES
4
5
6
/S/ Ronald Ellsberry
Ronald Elsberry
Attorney for Plaintiffs
7
8
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL)
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS
3
(Proposed) ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
Upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the
deadlines for the parties remaining summary judgment briefs be extended as follows:
1)
judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment by Friday, September 21, 2012;
2) Plaintiffs will file their combined reply and cross-opposition by Friday, October 19,
7
2012; and
8
9
3) Defendants will file their reply by November 16, 2012.
4) Hearing on the motions shall be continued to December 17, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
6
Dated: September _____, 2012
18
R NIA
FO
ER
H
17
RT
16
NO
15
LI
14
D
RDERE
OO
___________________________________
IT IS S
FIED
ELIZABETH D. ODI
S M LAPORTE
A
United States Magistrate Judge
porte
h D. La
Elizabet
Judge
A
13
UNIT
ED
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational Area, Case No. 3:08cv00722 (EDL)
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR REMAINING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFS
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?