Anderson-Francois v. County of Sonoma et al
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESCHEDULING OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2009)
Case 3:08-cv-00724-WHA
Document 47
Filed 04/06/2009
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747 THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
(San Francisco Division)
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) ) COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________)
ORALEE ANDERSON-FRANCOIS
Case No. C-08-00724 WHA STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: RESCHEDULING OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE Current Date: April 30, 2009 Proposed New Date: May 21, 2009 Time: 8:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 9
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2009, Defendants County of Sonoma and Jerry Newman (the "County Defendants") submitted a Motion for Summary Judgment, or, alternatively, partial summary judgment, scheduled for hearing on April 30, 2009, and, WHEREAS Plaintiff's counsel is in trial in the Alameda County Superior Court on April 30, 2009, and, WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel also intends to file a Motion for Summary Judgment, and _____________________________________________________________________________ 1
Stipulation and Order Re: Move Hearing Date Anderson v. Sonoma County U.S. District Court Northern Dist (S.F) Case No. C-08-00724 WHA
Case 3:08-cv-00724-WHA
Document 47
Filed 04/06/2009
Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
WHEREAS, Counsel for the Defendant City of Santa Rosa and its individually named employee defendants also intend to file a Motion for Summary Judgment, the parties through their counsel of record do hereby stipulate as follows and respectfully request this court order same: 1. The hearing on the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set for April 30, 2009, at 8:00 a.m., be rescheduled to May 21, 2009, at
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _____________________________________________________________________________ 2
Stipulation and Order Re: Move Hearing Date Anderson v. Sonoma County U.S. District Court Northern Dist (S.F) Case No. C-08-00724 WHA
8:00 a.m.; and 2. Any Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by the Plaintiff, and/or the City of Santa Rosa and the individually named defendants thereof, shall also be set for hearing on May 21, 2009, at 8:00 a.m., and shall be filed no less than 35 days before May 21, 2009. IT IS SO STIPULATED. SUNTAG & FEUERSTEIN, A Professional Corporation 4/3/2009 ____/S/ DANA A. SUNTAG_____ DANA A. SUNTAG Attorneys for Defendants County Of Sonoma and Jerry Newman ____/S/ ROBERT R. POWELL___ ROBERT R. POWELL Attorneys for Plaintiff ____/S/ BRUCE A. KILDAY____ BRUCE A. KILDAY Attorneys for Defendants City of Santa Rosa, Brad Connors, John Fehlman.
4/3/2009
4/3/2009
Case 3:08-cv-00724-WHA
Document 47
Filed 04/06/2009
Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
ORDER Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, the court hereby orders and finds as follows; 1. The hearing on the County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set for April 30, 2009, at 8:00 a.m. is rescheduled to May 21, 2009, at 8:00 a.m.; and 2. Any Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by the Plaintiff, and/or the City of Santa Rosa and the individually named defendants thereof, shall also be set for hearing on May 21, 2009, at 8:00 a.m., and shall be filed no less than 35 days before May 21, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 4/____/2009
UNIT ED
ISTRIC ES D TC AT T
RT U O
S
Judge ____________________________ JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT ER C COURT,N D NORTHERNFDISTRICT O IS T RI T OF CALIFORNIAC San Francisco
_____________________________________________________________________________ 3
Stipulation and Order Re: Move Hearing Date Anderson v. Sonoma County U.S. District Court Northern Dist (S.F) Case No. C-08-00724 WHA
A
LI
FO
William
Alsup
R NIA
IT IS S
O ORD
ERED
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?