Anderson-Francois v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 72

ORDER REGARDING 53 55 66 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009) Modified on 4/24/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/18/2009 (sis, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 23, 2009. v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, CITY OF SANTA ROSA, JERRY NEWMAN, BRAD CONNORS, OFFICER HOOD, JOHN FELMAN, and DOES 1­25, inclusive, Defendants. / ORALEE ANDERSON-FRANCOIS, Plaintiff, No. C 08-00724 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

This order addresses several administrative requests relating to four pending summary judgment motions. An April 14 order denied a prior motion to seal filed by the County without prejudice to a more narrowly tailored sealing request. The County has now filed an amended request to seal exhibits designated as confidential by state statute or court, and references thereto in its motion (Dkt. No. 55). The amended request, being narrowly tailored, is GRANTED. The City filed a request to seal four exhibits designated as confidential in the state proceedings (Dkt. No. 53-5). The request is GRANTED. Plaintiff also submitted a request to file two such confidential exhibits under seal (Dkt. No. 66). The request is GRANTED. Finally, plaintiff filed a renewed request for permission to exceed the page limit by four pages (a previous, larger request having been denied). The limited renewed request is reasonable under the circumstances and is GRANTED. Defendants may similarly utilize up to five additional pages in their opposition briefs if need be. There will be no additional pages in the replies.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE