Walker v. Jones et al
Filing
190
ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/31/2012. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
MICHAEL GERCHOW, State Bar #245706
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3936
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Attorneys for Defendants
Deputy Jones, Lieutenant Cabebe and
Asuncion Bendebel
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
JEFFREY WALKER,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER JONES, ASUCION BENDEBEL,
CN, STACY WILSON, THERAPIST,
SRGT. CABEBE, PES MD DOE, JOHN
DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN
DOE 4, JOHN DOE 5, JANE DOE
SUPERVISORY OFFICIAL, Sued in their
Individual and Official Capacities,
Case No. 08-CV-0757 CRB
STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST FOR
RELIEF FROM ORDER SETTING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendants.
19
20
21
Pursuant to Local Rules 16-2(d) and 7-12, Plaintiff Jeffrey E. Walker and Defendants
22
stipulate and jointly request a continuance of the Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this
23
case for 21 days, and that the settlement conference be set for a date no earlier than October 1, 2012.
24
Per the Court's order of August 3, 2012, the Case Management Conference is set for Friday,
25
September 28, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., and the case has been referred for settlement mediation before
26
Magistrate Judge Vadas. The settlement conference is currently scheduled for September 4, 2012.
27
28
The parties agree that the interests of justice would be served by a 21 day continuance of the
CMC and that the settlement conference occur no earlier than October 1, 2012. Since the Court's
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DATES
USDC Case No. 08-CV-0757 CRB
1
c:\temp\notes56fd74\00794530.doc
1
order, the parties arranged to convene for three key depositions prior to meeting for a third
2
settlement conference. However, due to scheduling conflicts on behalf of defendants, the three
3
depositions will not be concluded until September 25, 2012. All three depositions have been noticed
4
on dates agreed upon by the parties, and should be concluded by the September 25, 2012 date.
5
Both parties continue to agree that mediation may be successful in this case, and that
6
mediation should take place before the CMC. Continuing the CMC for 21 days will allow Plaintiff
7
to take three key depositions, receive and review the transcripts, and take part in a meaningful
8
mediation session. In so doing, the dispute is more likely to be resolved through mediation with no
9
further judicial intervention.
10
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED, AND REQUESTED by the
11
parties, through their respective counsel, that the Initial Case Management Conference currently
12
scheduled to take place on September 28, 2012 be continued until October 19, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., or
13
on such a date and at such a time thereafter as is convenient for the Court, and that the Settlement
14
Mediation be continued until no earlier than October 1, 2012, or on such a date and time thereafter as
15
is convenient for the Court.
16
17
Dated: August 30, 2012
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Deputy
18
19
20
By:
/s/ Michael Gerchow
MICHAEL GERCHOW
Deputy City Attorney
21
22
23
Attorneys for Defendants Deputy Jones, Lt. Cabebe,
and Ms. Bendebel
24
25
Dated: August 30, 2012
26
By:
/s/ Robert J. Williams
ROBERT J. WILLIAMS
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
27
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeffrey E. Walker
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DATES
USDC Case No. 08-CV-0757 CRB
2
c:\temp\notes56fd74\00794530.doc
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
2
3
DATED:
August 31
, 2012
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING DATES
USDC Case No. 08-CV-0757 CRB
3
c:\temp\notes56fd74\00794530.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?