Walker v. Jones et al
Filing
193
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Not Settled. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 10/18/12. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
JEFFREY WALKER,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v
15
OFFICER JONES, et al.
Case No C 08-757 CRB
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDING
Defendants.
16
17
18
A settlement conference in this matter was held on October 16, 2012 in San
19
20
Francisco. The results of that proceeding are indicated below:
21
(1)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
proceeding, each possessing the requisite settlement authority:
: Plaintiff’s counsel Donald Brown and Robert Williams and Plaintiff by phone
9 Warden or warden’s representative
9 Office of the California Attorney General
: Other: Office of the City Attorney, Michael Gerchow
1
(2)
The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
2
(3)
The outcome of the proceeding was:
3
4
9 The case has been completely settled.
9 The case has been partially resolved and, on or before
5
_______________________, counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation specifying
6
those claims which have been resolved and those that remain to be resolved by the Court.
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 The parties agree to an additional follow up settlement on
______________________________________________________________________.
:
The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
Date: 10/18/12
_______________________________
Nandor J Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?