Harris v. Astrue

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING 19 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on September 18, 2008. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ANGELA D. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) Civil No. C08-00831 JSW ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of (30) days up through and including Wednesday, October 22, 2008 in which to e-file her Response to Defendant's CrossMotion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by the number of other cases (5) Plaintiff's counsel currently has before the district court that also require briefing around this time period. 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney Dated: September 18, 2008 /s/ SHEA LITA BOND Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dated: September 18, 2008 /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff ANGELA D. HARRIS IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2008 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?