Phoenix Solutions Inc v. Wells Fargo & Company

Filing 151

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING 43 51 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment to 1/5/2009 02:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/14/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TROJAN LAW OFFICES R. JOSEPH TROJAN - #137067 9250 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 325 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff PHOENIX SOLUTIONS, INC. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 EUGENE M. PAIGE - #202849 RYAN M. KENT - #220441 SONALI D. MAITRA - #254896 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and WELLS FARGO FUNDS MANAGEMENT, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PHOENIX SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a Delaware corporation, and WELLS FARGO FUNDS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant.

Case No. CV 08-0863 MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7 REGARDING DATE OF HEARING ON PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT *As amended by Court.

429931.01

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7 REGARDING DATE OF HEARING ON PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08-0863 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7, undersigned counsel for Phoenix Solutions, Inc. ("Phoenix") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") jointly and respectfully submit this stipulation regarding the date of the hearing on the parties' motions for summary judgment in this matter. 1. On June 9, 2008, the Court entered a minute order (Docket No. 36) that set

November 10, 2008, as the hearing date for initial summary judgment motions on inequitable conduct and anticipation. 2. On September 8, 2008, each party filed a motion for summary judgment (Docket

Nos. 53 & 51) that noticed the motion to be heard on November 10, 2008. 3. On October 24, 2008, the Court rescheduled the hearing date on each party's

motion for summary judgment to November 24, 2008 (Docket No. 111). 4. Counsel for Wells Fargo, Daralyn Durie, has a conflict with appearing on

November 24, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. because of a previously scheduled deposition. After conferring, the parties determined that December 1, 2008, was a mutually convenient date for the hearing. 5. Counsel for Phoenix and Wells Fargo therefore stipulate to, and respectfully

request, an Order rescheduling the hearing on each party's motion for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 53 & 51) to Monday, December 1, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

Dated: October 30, 2008

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ R. Joseph Trojan ________________ R. Joseph Trojan Attorneys for Plaintiff PHOENIX SOLUTIONS, INC. Dated: October 30, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

By:

/s/ Ryan M. Kent __________________ Ryan M. Kent Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

1
429931.01

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7 REGARDING DATE OF HEARING ON PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08-0863 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[PROPOSED] ORDER Upon the joint stipulation of the parties, the request to reschedule the hearing on each January 5, 2009 party's motion for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 43 & 51) to December 1, 2008, at 2:00 p.m. is GRANTED. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/14/2008

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

2
429931.01

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-7 REGARDING DATE OF HEARING ON PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASE NO. CV 08-0863 MHP

A

C

LI

FO

HON. MARILYN HALL PATEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE l H. Pate Marilyn Judge

R NIA

D RDERE S SO O ______________________________________ IT I
NO

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

RT

H