Phoenix Solutions Inc v. Wells Fargo & Company

Filing 164

ORDER GRANTING Phoenix Solution, Inc.'s Request 162 to use electronic equipment at Tutorial Hearing on 12/4/08. Signed by Judge Marilyn H. Patel on 12/3/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TROJAN LAW OFFICES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a Delaware corporation, et al. Defendants. Date: December 4, 2008 Time: 2:30 p.m. Hon. Marilyn H. Patel CASE NO. CV08-0863 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PHOENIX SOLUTION, INC.'S REQUEST TO USE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AT TUTORIAL HEARING ON DECEMBER 4, 2008 13 BEVERLY HILLS 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Request to Use Electronic Equipment CV08-0863 MHP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TROJAN LAW OFFICES Upon consideration of Phoenix Solutions, Inc.'s ("Phoenix") Request to Use Electronic Equipment for Tutorial Hearing on December 4, 2008, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Phoenix's Request to Use Electronic Equipment for Tutorial Hearing on December 4, 2008 is granted. Phoenix shall be allowed to bring into the courthouse located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue and use in Courtroom 15 the following electronic equipment: one (1) projector one (1) laptop to interface with courtroom monitors/computers/displays one (1) set of speakers various cords, cables, and other peripheral equipment. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 BEVERLY HILLS UNIT ED 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Request to Use Electronic Equipment S S DISTRICT TE C TA Dated: 12/3/08 ER N D IS T IC T R OF -1- A C LI CV08-0863 MHP FO Hon. Judge Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaPatel rilyn H. dge Ma Ju R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?