Acer, Inc. et al v. Technology Properties Limited et al

Filing 314

STIPULATION AND ORDER re (313 in 3:08-cv-00877-JW) Stipulation filed by Gateway, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Acer, Inc. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/5/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

UNIT
ED

S

1
2

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE Defendants] C
[See Signature Page for Information on Counsel for Plaintiffs and
TA

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10
11
12

FO

LI
A

E

H

8

Judge Ja

RT

7

re
mes Wa

NO

6

R NIA

3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND

ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA
CORPORATION and GATEWAY, INC.,

RN
Case No. 3:08-cv-00877 JW

Plaintiffs,

EXPAND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

v.
[RELATED CASES]
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,
and ALLIACENSE LIMITED,
Defendants.

13
14

HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA,
INC.,

15

Plaintiffs,

16

v.

17
18

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED,
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION,
and ALLIACENSE LIMITED,

19

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25

BARCO N.V., a Belgian corporation,

Case No. 3:08-cv-00882 JW

Case No. 3:08-cv-05398 JW

Plaintiff,
v.
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD.,
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP.,
ALLIACENSE LTD.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
Case Nos. 3:08-cv-00877, 3:08-cv-00882, 3:08-cv-05398
STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPAND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

1

On November 23, 2010, Judge Fogel granted a stipulated request expanding page limits for

2

claim construction briefing for the parties Acer, Inc., Acer America, Inc. and Gateway, Inc.

3

(collectively “Acer”) (Dkt. 211), Barco, N.V. (“Barco”) (Dkt. 114), HTC Corp. and HTC America,

4

Inc. (collectively “HTC”) (Dkt. 227) (Acer, Barco and HTC collectively “Plaintiffs”) and

5

Technology Properties Ltd., Patriot Scientific Corp. and Alliacense, Ltd. (collectively “TPL” or

6

“Defendants”). In particular, this Court permitted the page limits under Local Rules 7-2, 7-3 and

7

7-4 on the parties’ claim construction briefs to be expanded as follows:

8

1. The page limit of Defendants’ opening brief was expanded from 25 to 30 pages;

9

2. The page limit of Plaintiffs’ combined responsive brief was expanded from 25 to 35

10

pages; and

11

3. The page limit of Defendants’ reply brief was expanded from 15 to 20 pages.

12

Plaintiffs and Defendants are uncertain as to whether the stipulated request of November 23,

13

2010 remains in effect. Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendants, pursuant to Northern District of

14

California Civil Local Rule 7-12, make this stipulated request for an order consolidating and

15

expanding the page limits for claim construction briefing:

16
17
18
19

WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and agreed that each side, Plaintiffs and
Defendants, will submit combined briefs;
WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed that the page limits provided in Northern
District Local Rules 7-2, 7-3 and 7-4 should be expanded for this combined briefing;

20

ACCORDINGLY, it is HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties and their

21

counsel of record, who respectfully request that the Court expand the page limits under Local

22

Rules 7-2, 7-3 and 7-4 on the parties’ claim construction briefs as follows:

23

1. The page limit of Plaintiffs’ combined responsive brief is expanded from 25 to 30

24

pages; and

25

2. The page limit of Defendants’ reply brief is expanded from 15 to 20 pages.

26
27
28
-1Case Nos. 5:08-cv-00877, 5:08-cv-00882, 5:08-cv-05398
STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPAND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

1
2

Dated: January 5, 2012

AGILITY IP LAW, LLP

3
By: ___/s/_James Otteson_______________
James C. Otteson

4
5

Attorneys for Defendants TECHNOLOGY
PROPERTIES LIMITED and ALLIACENSE
LIMITED

6
7

Dated: January 5, 2012

KIRBY NOONAN LANCE &HOGE

8
9

By: __/s/_Charles Hoge______________
Charles T. Hoge

10

Attorneys for Defendant PATRIOT
SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

11
12
13

Dated: January 5, 2012

K&L GATES LLP

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Timothy Walker
Timothy P. Walker, Esq.
[e-mail]
Howard Chen, Esq.
[e-mail]
Harold H. Davis, Jr., Esq.
[e-mail]
Jas Dhillon, Esq.
[e-mail]
Jeffrey M. Ratinoff
[e-mail]
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Acer, Inc., Acer America Corp.
and Gateway, Inc.

26
27
28
-2Case Nos. 5:08-cv-00877, 5:08-cv-00882, 5:08-cv-05398
STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPAND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

1
2
Dated: January 5, 2012

COOLEY LLP

3
4
By: /s/ Kyle Chen
Kyle D. Chen, Esq.
[e-mail]
Heidi L. Keefe, Esq.
[e-mail]
Mark R. Weinstein, Esq.
[e-mail]
Cooley LLP
3000 El Camino Real
Five Palo Alto Square, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94306
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for HTC Corporation and HTC
America, Inc.

12
13
14

Dated: January 5, 2012

BAKER & MCKENZIE

15
16

20

By: /s/ Edward Runyan
Edward Runyan, Esq.
[e-mail]
Baker & McKenzie
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

21

Attorneys for Barco, N.V.

17
18
19

22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27

January 5
Dated: ________________, 2012

_______________________________
Hon. James Ware
United States District Court Judge

28
-3Case Nos. 5:08-cv-00877, 5:08-cv-00882, 5:08-cv-05398
STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE AND EXPAND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING