Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al

Filing 266

Order Regarding The Production of Documents that Contain Confidential Information of TSMC Entities by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd(tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009) Modified on 11/23/2009 (tf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 William H. Manning (pro hac vice) WHManning@rkmc.com Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) BPEngdahl@rkmc.com Samuel L. Walling (pro hac vice) SLWalling@rkmc.com Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) Rhaslam@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-632-4700 Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine Saunders Haskett (Bar No. 188053) Chaskett@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-6000 Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Alan H. Blankenheimer (Bar No. 218713) ablankenheimer@cov.com Laura E. Muschamp (Bar No. 228717) lmuschamp@cov.com Jo Dale Carothers (Bar No. 228703) jcarothers@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP 9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor San Diego, CA 92122-1225 Telephone: (858) 678-1800 Facsimile: (858) 678-1600 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS THAT CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF TSMC ENTITIES [Civil L.R. 7-12] Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC (collectively, "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd.; and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung") jointly submit this Stipulation regarding the production of documents that contain confidential information of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, Ltd. and/or TSMC North America, Inc (collectively, "the TSMC Entities"). WHEREAS, certain ATI products accused in this lawsuit by Samsung allegedly were manufactured by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.. WHEREAS, the TSMC Entities are third parties with a heightened interest in protecting their highly confidential technical information, the parties have agreed to certain additional protections in order to facilitate production of documents and other information that contain confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between AMD and Samsung that, subject to the Court's approval, the Joint Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. #60), and amendments thereto, will be amended as follows for the purpose of any documents produced in this litigation that contain confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities ("TSMC Entities Confidential Information"). This stipulation relates only to confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities, which includes documents produced by AMD that are proprietary documents of any of the TSMC Entities or otherwise contain confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities; and confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities obtained through other means, such as deposition testimony, and does not alter the agreement of the parties or any stipulation or Order currently in place between the parties with respect to documents or information that do not contain confidential information of any of the TSMC Entities. (1) Section 5.2(b) shall be modified at page 5, line 28; page 6 , line 5; page 6, line 9; page; 6, line 15 to add: "or Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" following "Highly Confidential ­ Outside Counsel's Eyes Only." CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -1- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (2) Section 7.3 will be modified to add: (c) Any TSMC Entities Confidential Information, as defined above, designated as "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" may not be disclosed to mock jury members. (3) Section 7.3(a) will be modified to add: disclosure of any TSMC Entities Confidential Information, as defined above, designated as "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" to a person described in Section 7.2(f) may be made only as may be permitted below by Section 7.3(b). (4) Section 10 will be modified to add, starting at the end of line 20 of page 12: The parties agree that they will file under seal as permitted by Judge Illston's Standing Order, or any other applicable rule or law, any information or item in any form that has been designated "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" that contains any TSMC Entities Confidential Information or any information derived therefrom. (5) Section 13.1 will be modified to add: No modification of the Protective Order will be permitted that will have the effect of altering any provision that applies to any information or item designated "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" that contains any TSMC Entities Confidential Information or any information derived therefrom in a manner such that any TSMC Entities Confidential Information is made any more accessible than as permitted herein without the written permission of the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) or as ordered by the Court. No party shall seek any such modification to the Protective Order without the written permission of the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) or without filing a motion pursuant Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable). Notice of any such motion must be given to the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) in the same manner and time as required to be made to a party. Nothing in this paragraph shall have the effect of making any of the TSMC Entities a party to this action. (6) A new section, 13.6, will be added that provides: Subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence, any information or item in any form designated as "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" that contains any TSMC Entities Confidential Information or derived therefrom will be offered or received into evidence at any court hearing or in any trial of the matter only in CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -2- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 camera, meaning that the courtroom is closed to all individuals other than outside counsel for the parties and any necessary law firm staff of the firms of the parties' outside counsel assisting at trial, the judge, the jury, and any necessary court personnel, unless agreed to by the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) or as ordered by the Court. No person shall seek to introduce or have received into evidence other than in camera any information or item in any form designated "Highly Confidential -- Restricted Access Only" that contains any TSMC Entities Confidential Information or derived therefrom without the written permission of the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) or without filing a motion pursuant Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable). Notice of any such motion must be given to the appropriate TSMC Entit(ies) in the same manner and time as required to be made to a party." Nothing in this paragraph shall have the effect of making any of the TSMC Entities a party to this action. DATED: November 19, 2009 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: /s/ Cole M. Fauver Cole M. Fauver Samuel L. Walling ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC DATED: November 19, 2009 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: /s/ Laura E. Muschamp Robert T. Haslam Christine Saunders Haskett Laura E. Muschamp ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., LTD.; AND SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________, 2009 __________________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -4- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC Case3:08-cv-00986-SI Document265 Filed11/19/09 Page6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SD: 3554-1 ECF CERTIFICATION I, Laura E. Muschamp, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation regarding the Production of Documents That Contain Confidential Information of TSMC Entities. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Cole M. Fauver has concurred in this filing. DATED: November 19, 2009 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By /s/ Laura E. Muschamp LAURA E. MUSCHAMP Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -5- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RE TSMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?