Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al

Filing 405

ORDER extending deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: WHManning@rkmc.com Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: BPEngdahl@rkmc.com Cole M. Fauver (pro hac vice) E-mail: CMFauver@rkmc.com Logan J. Drew (pro hac vice) E-mail: LJDrew@rkmc.com Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) E-mail: Rhaslam@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-632-4700 Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine S. Haskett (Bar No. 188053) E-mail: Chaskett@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-6000 Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Alan H. Blankenheimer (Bar No. 218713) E-mail: ablankenheimer@cov.com Laura E. Muschamp (Bar No. 228717) E-mail: lmuschamp@cov.com Jo Dale Carothers (Bar No. 228703) E-mail: jcarothers@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP 9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor San Diego, CA 92122-1225 Telephone: 858-678-1800 Facsimile: 858-678-1600 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING TO EXTEND THE DEADLINES TO FILE CERTAIN MOTIONS TO COMPEL IF THE PARTIES CANNOT REACH AGREEMENT ON THE SPECIFIED DISPUTES [Civil L.R. 7-12] CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUESTING DEADLINE EXTENSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC (collectively, "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, and Samsung Digital Imaging Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Samsung") jointly submit this Stipulation regarding the request to extend the deadline to file motions to compel regarding specified discovery disputes. WHEREAS, the parties agree that there is still room for more negotiation which may obviate the need to engage in motions practice with regard to discovery issues concerning U.S. Patent No. 5,740,065 ("'065 patent"). Therefore, the parties jointly stipulate to request to extend the deadline to file discovery-related motions to compel solely with respect to the following discovery requests: Samsung's Interrogatory 98, Samsung's related 30(b)(6) deposition request Topic 31 served February 5, 2010, AMD's Request for Production 276, AMD's Interrogatories 58-60 and AMD's related 30(b)(6) deposition request Topic 323 served January 5, 2010. WHEREAS, the parties agree that there is still room for more negotiation which may obviate the need to engage in motions practice with regard to the production of additional AMD sales data. Therefore, the parties jointly stipulate to request to extend the deadline to file discovery-related motions to compel solely with respect to the production of additional AMD sales data. WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled a telephonic meet-and-confer to be held on Sunday, March 28, 2010, during which the parties will attempt to resolve the issues set forth above. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between AMD and Samsung that, subject to the Court's approval, the deadline for filing motions to compel with respect to the issues set forth above shall be extended by five (5) days (until March 31, 2010). The parties further agree that this stipulation will in no way lengthen the period of time in which to serve discovery. With regard to discovery issues relating to the '065 patent, the parties further agree that this stipulation will not change or serve as the basis for changing any other deadline in the case, particularly the deadlines for serving expert reports. CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -2- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUESTING DEADLINE EXTENSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 With regard to AMD sales data issues, AMD will continue to contest any extension to the expert report due date. DATED: March 26, 2010 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: /s/Cole M. Fauver William H. Manning Cole M. Fauver Logan J. Drew ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC DATED: March 26, 2010 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: /s/Christine Saunders Haskett Christine Saunders Haskett Alexa Hansen ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; SAMSUNG DIGITAL IMAGING CO., LTD. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________, 2010 __________________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI -3- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUESTING DEADLINE EXTENSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: March 26, 2010 ECF CERTIFICATION I, Logan J. Drew, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation regarding requesting to extend deadlines to file motions to compel on specific items of discovery. I hereby attest that Christine S. Haskett has concurred in this filing. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By /s/Logan J. Drew LOGAN J. DREW 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV-08-0986-SI Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-defendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. -4- STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUESTING DEADLINE EXTENSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?