Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al

Filing 426

ORDER dismissal of certain counterclaims (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: WHManning@rkmc.com Cole M. Fauver (pro hac vice) Email: CMFauver@rkmc.com Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: BPEngdahl@rkmc.com Samuel L. Walling (pro hac vice) E-mail: SLWalling@rkmc.com Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) E-mail: Rhaslam@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-632-4700 Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine Saunders Haskett (Bar No. 188053) E-mail: Chaskett@cov.com Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-6000 Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN COUNTERCLAIMS Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC (collectively, "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("SEC"); Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; and Samsung Digital Imaging Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Samsung"), by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Case No. CV-08-0986-SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. SEC's counterclaim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,781,750 against AMD is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all products accused in this case, as identified in Exhibit 1 hereto. 2. AMD's counterclaim for declaratory judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,781,750 is hereby dismissed without prejudice. 3. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. DATED: March 10, 2010 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By:__/s/ Cole M. Fauver____________________ Cole M. Fauver ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC DATED: March 10, 2010 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By: __/s/ Robert T. Haslam__________________ Robert T. Haslam ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; AND SAMSUNG DIGITAL IMAGING CO., LTD. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________, 2010 __________________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge Case No. CV-08-0986-SI -2- STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN COUNTERCLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV-08-0986-SI Exhibit 1 K6E K6-2E K6-2E+ K6CH K6-IIIE+ K6LF K6ST K6ST50 K8DH K8SH K8-BH65 K8-BH90 K8BHE4 K8CH K8-DH65 K8-DH90 K8E-BH65 K8E-BH90 K8E-DH65 K8E-DH90 K8E-JH90 K8E-SH90 K8-JH90 K8-SH90 K8SHE4N6 GHDEER GHDEER-E GHRIDGE GFNLION -3- STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN COUNTERCLAIMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV-08-0986-SI ECF CERTIFICATION I, Robert T. Haslam, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulated Dismissal of Certain Counterclaims in compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that William H. Manning has concurred in this filing. DATED: March 10, 2010 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By __/s/ Robert T. Haslam ROBERT T. HASLAM Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. -4- STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN COUNTERCLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?