Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al

Filing 484

ORDER RE: OBJECTION TO CERTAIN EVIDENCE OFFERED BY AMD(Docket No. 471) (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., et al., Defendants and Counterclaimants. / Samsung has objected to AMD's proposed use at the summary judgment hearing of sample accused products loaded with third-party software to the extent such software is not sold with Samsung products. Samsung states that AMD's proposed demonstration is improper because AMD did not assert contributory or indirect infringement in its Final Infringement Contentions or show that Samsung sells the accused products with such software. The objection is OVERRULED to the extent Samsung seeks to prevent AMD's demonstration at the summary judgment hearing. However, to the extent the Court concludes after the demonstration that the software falls outside the scope of AMD's claims, the Court will disregard the evidence in ruling on the summary judgment motion. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, et al., Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, No. C 08-00986 SI ORDER RE: OBJECTION TO CERTAIN EVIDENCE OFFERED BY AMD (Docket No. 471) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA