Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Filing
522
ORDER adjusting briefing on '893 patent (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2010)
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al
Doc. 522
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: WHManning@rkmc.com Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: BPEngdahl@rkmc.com Logan J. Drew (pro hac vice) E-mail: LJDrewrkmc.com Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 John P. Bovich (Bar No. 150688) E-mail: Jbovich@reedsmith.com Reed Smith LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-543-8700 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.
Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) E-mail: Rhaslam@cov.com Covington & Burling L.L.P. 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-632-4700 Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine Saunders Haskett (Bar No. 188053) E-mail: Chaskett@cov.com Covington & Burling L.L.P. One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-6000 Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Alan H. Blankenheimer (Bar No. 218713) E-mail: Ablankenheimer@cov.com Covington & Burling L.L.P. 9191 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 600 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: 858-658-1800 Facsimile: 858-678-1600 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
R O B I N S , K A P L A N , M I L L E R & C I R E S I L.L.P.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W
MINNEAPOLIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SAKAMOTO '893 PATENT [Civil L.R. 7-12]
21
v.
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC (collectively "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SAKAMOTO '893 PATENT
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Samsung Digital Imaging Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Samsung") jointly submit this Stipulation regarding the deadline for filing summary judgment motions relating to U.S. Patent No. 5,248,893 ("Sakamoto '893 patent"). WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled the deposition of Dr. Jack Lee, AMD's expert regarding the Sakamoto '893 patent, for July 28th and 29th, 2010. WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's Order with respect to the parties' Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Modifying Court's Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. #258), the dispositive motion filing cutoff is July 30, 2010. WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter a joint stipulation extending the dispositive motion filing cutoff solely for dispositive motions relating to the Sakamoto '893 patent. Now, therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between AMD and Samsung, that: With the Court's approval, the deadlines for dispositive motion briefing relating to the Sakamoto '893 patent shall be extended by one week, as set forth below:
1. Dispositive Motion Filing Cutoff 2. Oppositions to Dispositive Motions Due 3. Replies to Dispositive Motions Due
R O B I N S , K A P L A N , M I L L E R & C I R E S I L.L.P.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W
MINNEAPOLIS
August 6, 2010 August 20, 2010 August 27, 2010
The above agreement and modifications to the schedule for filing dispositive motions relating to the Sakamoto '893 patent will not otherwise affect the trial schedule for this case. All other dates on the trial schedule, including the dates for other dispositive motions, the cutoff date for dispositive motion hearings, and trial, shall remain as set forth in the Court's Order regarding the parties' Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Re: Modifying Court's Pretrial Preparation Order (Dkt. #258).
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SAKAMOTO '893 PATENT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DATED: June 30, 2010
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By: /s/William H. Manning William H. Manning Brad P. Engdahl ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC
DATED: June 30, 2010
COVINGTON & BURLING L.L.P. By: /s/Alan H. Blankenheimer Robert T. Haslam Alan H. Blankenheimer ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; SAMSUNG DIGITAL IMAGING CO., LTD.
R O B I N S , K A P L A N , M I L L E R & C I R E S I L.L.P.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A T T O R N E Y S AT L A W
MINNEAPOLIS
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________, 2010
____________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SAKAMOTO '893 PATENT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI
ECF CERTIFICATION I, Logan J. Drew, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order regarding the deadline for filing summary judgment motions relating to the Sakamoto '893 patent. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Alan H. Blankenheimer has concurred in this filing. DATED: June 30, 2010 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P By /s/ Logan J. Drew Logan J. Drew ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS RELATING TO THE SAKAMOTO '893 PATENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?