Toll Brothers, Inc v. Lin et al
Filing
145
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude or Limit Expert Testimony of Charles Hansen (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CHANG SU-O LIN; HONG LIEN LIN; HONG) ) YAO LIN, ) ) Defendants. ___________________________________) ) ) AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. ) TOLL BROTHERS, INC., Case No. 08-987 SC ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT EXPERT TESTIMONY OF CHARLES HANSEN
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On February 27, 2009, Defendants filed a supplemental brief regarding Defendants' designated expert Mr. Charles Hansen and in opposition to Plaintiff's motion in limine No. 5. Docket No. 143. Docket
Plaintiff filed an objection to the supplemental brief. No. 144.
The Court will allow Mr. Hansen to offer opinions on escrow company custom and practice surrounding the handling of closings and joint escrow instructions. Mr. Hansen's testimony will be
limited to this topic, and any testimony that the Court determines to be a legal opinion will be excluded. Plaintiff's motion in
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
For the Northern District of California
limine to exclude or limit the expert testimony of Mr. Hansen is therefore GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 2, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?