Bertone v. City & County of San Francisco et al
Filing
51
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 50 Motion to Continue (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961
Chief Trial Deputy
BRADLEY A. RUSSI, State Bar #256993
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
(415) 554-3964
Facsimile:
(415) 554-3837
Email: brad.russi@sfgov.org
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
DONALD G. BERTONE,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO
POLICE DEPT., SAN FRANCISCO
GENERAL HOSPITAL, SAN
FRANCISCO SHERIFF’S DEPT. and
DOES 1-100,
Case No. 08-cv-01003-MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
19
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s
20
Administrative Motion Continue Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 30, 2012.
21
The Court having reviewed Defendant’s motion, the complete file in this matter, and being otherwise
22
fully advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS the motion. The May 24, 2012 hearing on
23
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to May 31, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in
24
Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
___________________________________
MARIA ELENA JAMES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON ADMIN. MOT.;
Bertone v. CCSF, Case No.: 08-CV-01003 MEJ
1
c:\documents and settings\brussi\desktop\bertone\bertone v.
ccsf - proposed order on motion to continue msj hearing.doc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, MONICA TREJO, declare as follows:
I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within
entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building,
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
On April 30, 2012, I served the attached:
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed
as follows:
Donald G. Bertone
1115 Post Street, #14
San Francisco, CA 94109
Plaintiff in pro per
and served the named document in the manner indicated below:
BY MAIL: I caused true and correct copies of the above documents, by following ordinary business practices,
to be placed and sealed in envelope(s) addressed to the addressee(s), at the City Attorney’s Office of San
Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 1390 Market Street, City and County of San Francisco, California, 94102, for
collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service, and in the ordinary course of business,
correspondence placed for collection on a particular day is deposited with the United States Postal Service that
same day.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
is true and correct.
18
Executed April 30, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
19
/s/ Monica Trejo
20
MONICA TREJO
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON ADMIN. MOT.;
Bertone v. CCSF, Case No.: 08-CV-01003 MEJ
2
c:\documents and settings\brussi\desktop\bertone\bertone v.
ccsf - proposed order on motion to continue msj hearing.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?