Bertone v. City & County of San Francisco et al

Filing 51

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 50 Motion to Continue (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy BRADLEY A. RUSSI, State Bar #256993 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3964 Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 Email: brad.russi@sfgov.org 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DONALD G. BERTONE, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 vs. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPT., SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL, SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF’S DEPT. and DOES 1-100, Case No. 08-cv-01003-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 19 THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s 20 Administrative Motion Continue Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on April 30, 2012. 21 The Court having reviewed Defendant’s motion, the complete file in this matter, and being otherwise 22 fully advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS the motion. The May 24, 2012 hearing on 23 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to May 31, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in 24 Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 ___________________________________ MARIA ELENA JAMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON ADMIN. MOT.; Bertone v. CCSF, Case No.: 08-CV-01003 MEJ 1 c:\documents and settings\brussi\desktop\bertone\bertone v. ccsf - proposed order on motion to continue msj hearing.doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PROOF OF SERVICE I, MONICA TREJO, declare as follows: I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled action. I am employed at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102. On April 30, 2012, I served the attached: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT on the interested parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof in sealed envelope(s) addressed as follows: Donald G. Bertone 1115 Post Street, #14 San Francisco, CA 94109 Plaintiff in pro per and served the named document in the manner indicated below: BY MAIL: I caused true and correct copies of the above documents, by following ordinary business practices, to be placed and sealed in envelope(s) addressed to the addressee(s), at the City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, Fox Plaza Building, 1390 Market Street, City and County of San Francisco, California, 94102, for collection and mailing with the United States Postal Service, and in the ordinary course of business, correspondence placed for collection on a particular day is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 18 Executed April 30, 2012, at San Francisco, California. 19 /s/ Monica Trejo 20 MONICA TREJO 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON ADMIN. MOT.; Bertone v. CCSF, Case No.: 08-CV-01003 MEJ 2 c:\documents and settings\brussi\desktop\bertone\bertone v. ccsf - proposed order on motion to continue msj hearing.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?