Ross v. Tomlab Optimization AB

Filing 56

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for defendants to file answer/counterclaims to 1/13/2009; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 12/9/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2008)

David E. Newhouse, Esq. State Bar No. 54217 NEWHOUSE & ASSOCIATES Tel. No. [phone] Twin Oaks Office Plaza Fax. No. [phone] 477 Ninth Avenue Ste 112 Email: [e-mail] San Mateo, Ca. 94402-1858 Attorney for Defendant TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. MICHAEL ROSS, an individual Plaintiff v. TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB, TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION, INC., ANIL RAO, Defendants

For Court Use Only

CASE. NO. C08-cv-01052 MHP

SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AND COUNTER CLAIM [Local Rule 6] 1 2 3 4 5 Plaintiff I. MICHAEL ROSS and Defendant TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB by and through their respective attorneys, Stuart C. Clark, Esq. and David E. Newhouse, Esq. stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Time for Defendant TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB to serve an answer with possible counter claims is extended THIRTY (30) days from December 13, 2008 to January 13, 2008. Dated: December 8 , 2008 ____________________________________ Stuart C. Clark, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff I. MICHAEL ROSS 6 Dated: December 5, 2008R IST

UNIT ED

S

SD TE TA

ICT C
RT U O
R NIA

David E. Newhouse

O ORD IT IS S
UNIT ED

ERED

____________________________________ David E. Newhouse, Esq. Attorney for Defendant TOMLAB OPTIMIZATION AB

Digitally signed by David E. Newhouse DN: cn=David E. Newhouse, o=Newhouse & Associates, ou, email=[e-mail], c=US Date: 2008.12.05 18:04:58 -08'00'

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Marilyn

H. Patel

R NIA

IT IS SO

ORDERED

RT U O

R NEWHOUSE & ASSOCIATES

F D I S Mateo, CA O 477 Ninth Ave. 112 San T R I C T 94402-1858 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] email: [e-mail]

E

N

C STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AND COUNTER CLAIM

A

LI

FO

arilyn Judge M

NO

RT

H

l H. Pate

NO

RT

H

Page1