Wilkins v. Ahern
Filing
324
ORDER DENYING 323 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR DEFAULT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2013.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SHERIFF GREG AHERN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
_____________________________ )
KEENAN WILKINS,
No. C 08-1084 MMC (PR)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR
DEFAULT
(Docket No. 323)
17
18
On February 22, 2008, plaintiff, then a pretrial detainee at the Santa Rita County Jail
19
(“SRCJ”), and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
20
§ 1983. The operative pleading in the instant action is plaintiff’s Second Amended
21
Complaint (“SAC”), a sixty-page document that the Court previously determined stated
22
cognizable claims for relief, based on events that allegedly occurred between March 2007
23
and December 2008, during which time plaintiff was incarcerated at the SRCJ. By order
24
filed November 30, 2011, the Court granted plaintiff’s request to stay the instant action
25
pending resolution of criminal proceedings brought against him in Alameda County Superior
26
Court.
27
28
Now before the Court is plaintiff’s “motion for sanctions for default.” There has been
no default by any defendant. Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED.
1
This is the sixth frivolous request or motion filed by plaintiff since the case was
2
stayed. Accordingly, absent leave of court, no further motions by plaintiff shall be filed until
3
the stay is lifted.
4
This order terminates Docket No. 323.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
DATED: July 2, 2013
_________________________
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?