Wilkins v. Ahern

Filing 83

ORDER VACATING PRIOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE; GRANTING 22 DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 16, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SHERIFF GREG AHERN, et al., ) ) Defendants. _______________________________ ) KEENAN WILKINS, No. C 08-1084 MMC (PR) ORDER VACATING PRIOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE; GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 22) United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the briefing schedule for dispositive motions set forth in the Court's order of service (Docket No. 19) is hereby VACATED, and the request of defendants for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the second amended complaint is hereby GRANTED. (Docket No. 22.) Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later than October 19, 2009. If defendants elect to file a motion to dismiss, plaintiff shall file opposition to the motion within thirty days of the date the motion is filed. Defendants shall file a reply within twenty days of the date the opposition is filed. If defendants do not elect to file a motion to dismiss, they shall, upon the filing of their responsive pleading, inform the Court whether they are of the opinion that this case can be resolved by summary judgment. If defendants inform the Court that the case can be resolved by summary judgment, the Court will set a briefing schedule for the filing of a summary judgment motion. This order terminates Docket No. 22. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 16, 2009 _____________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?