Delil v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District
Filing
15
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR re 14 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/19/2008. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2008)
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ
Document 14
Filed 11/18/2008
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SIDNEY J~ COHE~ - 39023 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610
Telephone: (510) 893-6682
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLl YNN DELIL
6 7 8
9
HANSON BRIDGETTLLP
KIMON MANOLIUS -154971
kmanol ius(§hansonbridgett. corn
KURT-A. FRANKLIN ~ 172715
kfranklin(fhanson bridgett.com
ADAM W. HOFMANN - 238476
ahofmann~han$onbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
10 . San FranCisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 11
. 12
Attorneys for Defendant .
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
13 14
15
COURT
r:OR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18 19
HOll YNN DELlL,
No. C08-011 05
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
Plaintif,
v.
COMPLETE ADR
2o GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT;,
21. AND DOES 1 THOUGH 20, Inclusive,
Judge= Maria-Elena James
Action Filed: i=eb"uary 25~ 2008
!I
22
Defendants.
23 24 25 26 27
28
-1-
Plaintiff HOll YNN DEUL ("Deli") and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE
HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT rOìstrictU) are working with mediator
Howard A. Herman as part of the alternative dispute resolutìon process. Because of a family emergency. however~ Ms. Deli's counsel had to cancel the mediation
fPROPOSEDJ ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION (CASE NO. C08-01105- MEJ)
1673998.1
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ
Document 14
Filed 11/18/2008
Page 2 of 3
1 scheduled for Monday, November 17, 2008. The parties are rescheduling the
2 mediation with Mr. Herman for Januaiy 2009. If the mediation before Mr. Herman
3 fails, the parties.stil request assignment to an early settlement conference before
4 Magistrate Elizabeth Laporte. The
parties agree to complete this process before April
5 .1,2009.
B . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by
and between HOLLYNN DELlLI through her
7 attorney of record Sidney J. Cohen, and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE,
8 HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, through its attorney of record,
9 Hanson Bridgett LLP, that the parties wil continue to work through mediation in
10 accrdance with the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution
in the United
11 States District Court for the Nortern Dïstrict of California, and if mediation fails, to an
12 early settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte. The parties
13 jointly move this Court for an order extending the time to complete the ADR process
14 through Apri/1, 2009, or as soon thereafter as the schedules of Mr.. Herman, and
15 Magistrate Judge Laporte if necessary, permìt.
16
17 18 19
DATED: November 18, 2008
SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
BY:~
DATED: November 18,2008
By:
20
21
SIDNEY J. COH N Attorneys for Plaintiff
HOLL YNN DELIL .
22 23
24
25
KURT A. F NK
ADAM W. HOFMANN
KI NO I S
Attorneys for Defendant
GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
26
27
28
-2(PROPOSED) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION
(CASE NO. C08-011 05- MEJ)
1673998.1
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ
Document 14
Filed 11/18/2008
Page 3 of 3
1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that the partíes should continue their mediation
2 effort before Howard A Hennan, Director of ADR Programs,. United states District
3 . Court, Northern District of California. If mediation is not succssful, the parties shall
4 immediately be referred to an earty settlement conference wit Magistrate Judge
5 Elízabeth Laporte. This process shaH be completed before April
1 ,2009.
B
7
8 9
Dated:
November 19, 2009
MAGISTRATE
JUDGE MARIA..ELENA JAMES
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 25 26
27 28
~ 3fPROPOSEDJ ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION (CASE NO. C08-01106- MEJ)
1673998.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?