Delil v. Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District

Filing 15

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE ADR re 14 Stipulation filed by Golden Gate Bridge Highway & Transportation District. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/19/2008. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2008)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 14 Filed 11/18/2008 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SIDNEY J~ COHE~ - 39023 427 Grand Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 Telephone: (510) 893-6682 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLl YNN DELIL 6 7 8 9 HANSON BRIDGETTLLP KIMON MANOLIUS -154971 kmanol ius(§hansonbridgett. corn KURT-A. FRANKLIN ~ 172715 kfranklin(fhanson bridgett.com ADAM W. HOFMANN - 238476 ahofmann~han$onbridgett.com 425 Market Street, 26th Floor 10 . San FranCisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 11 . 12 Attorneys for Defendant . GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT UNITED STATES DISTRICT 13 14 15 COURT r:OR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 HOll YNN DELlL, No. C08-011 05 (PROPOSED) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO Plaintif, v. COMPLETE ADR 2o GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT;, 21. AND DOES 1 THOUGH 20, Inclusive, Judge= Maria-Elena James Action Filed: i=eb"uary 25~ 2008 !I 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- Plaintiff HOll YNN DEUL ("Deli") and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT rOìstrictU) are working with mediator Howard A. Herman as part of the alternative dispute resolutìon process. Because of a family emergency. however~ Ms. Deli's counsel had to cancel the mediation fPROPOSEDJ ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION (CASE NO. C08-01105- MEJ) 1673998.1 Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 14 Filed 11/18/2008 Page 2 of 3 1 scheduled for Monday, November 17, 2008. The parties are rescheduling the 2 mediation with Mr. Herman for Januaiy 2009. If the mediation before Mr. Herman 3 fails, the parties.stil request assignment to an early settlement conference before 4 Magistrate Elizabeth Laporte. The parties agree to complete this process before April 5 .1,2009. B . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between HOLLYNN DELlLI through her 7 attorney of record Sidney J. Cohen, and Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, 8 HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, through its attorney of record, 9 Hanson Bridgett LLP, that the parties wil continue to work through mediation in 10 accrdance with the Local Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the United 11 States District Court for the Nortern Dïstrict of California, and if mediation fails, to an 12 early settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte. The parties 13 jointly move this Court for an order extending the time to complete the ADR process 14 through Apri/1, 2009, or as soon thereafter as the schedules of Mr.. Herman, and 15 Magistrate Judge Laporte if necessary, permìt. 16 17 18 19 DATED: November 18, 2008 SIDNEY J. COHEN PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BY:~ DATED: November 18,2008 By: 20 21 SIDNEY J. COH N Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLL YNN DELIL . 22 23 24 25 KURT A. F NK ADAM W. HOFMANN KI NO I S Attorneys for Defendant GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 26 27 28 -2(PROPOSED) ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION (CASE NO. C08-011 05- MEJ) 1673998.1 Case 3:08-cv-01105-MEJ Document 14 Filed 11/18/2008 Page 3 of 3 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the partíes should continue their mediation 2 effort before Howard A Hennan, Director of ADR Programs,. United states District 3 . Court, Northern District of California. If mediation is not succssful, the parties shall 4 immediately be referred to an earty settlement conference wit Magistrate Judge 5 Elízabeth Laporte. This process shaH be completed before April 1 ,2009. B 7 8 9 Dated: November 19, 2009 MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA..ELENA JAMES 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ 3fPROPOSEDJ ORDER AND JOINT STIPULATION (CASE NO. C08-01106- MEJ) 1673998.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?