The Eidex Family Partnership, L.P. v. Justice

Filing 27

ORDER from USCA : All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT; No motion for reconsideration (ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)

Case: 09-71127

07/01/2009

Page: 1 of 2

DktEntry: 6976977

FILED
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUL 01 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

In re: CARLVIN JUSTICE.

N o . 09-71127 D .C . No. 3:08-cv-01173-EMC N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco

C A R L V I N JUSTICE, Petitioner,

ORDER v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, T H E EIDEX FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L .P ., Real Party in Interest.

B efo re: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PAEZ and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. P etitio n er has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

KW /M O A T T

Case: 09-71127

07/01/2009

Page: 2 of 2

DktEntry: 6976977

A ll pending motions are denied as moot. N o motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, or any other su b m issio n s shall be filed or entertained in this closed docket.

KW /M O A T T

2

0 9 -7 1 1 2 7