California Resources Agency et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER amending briefing schedules for summary judgment; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 4/14/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY, et al., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Nos. 08-01185-MHP and 08-03884-MHP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. The matter having come before the Court on the Parties' Stipulated Motion to Amend the Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule, the Court, having considered the Motion, hereby GRANTS the Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The revised schedule for summary judgment briefing is as follows: Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support of Cross-Motion and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment Defendant-Intervenors' amicus curiae brief Plaintiffs' Consolidated Replies and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Case Nos. 08-1185, 08-08-3884 April 15, 2009 April 22, 2009 May 22, 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants' Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 14th DATED this _____ day of April, 2009. June 22, 2009 UNIT ED _______________________________ JUDGE MARILYN H. PATEL S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R Case Nos. 08-01185, 08-03884 A C LI FO Ju rilyn H dge Ma . Patel R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?