Bryant et al v. Service Corporation International et al

Filing 115

ORDER re motion to compel. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/2/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2009)

Case 3:08-cv-01190-SI

Document 114-2

Filed 01/29/2009

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5

STEVEN H. GURNEE, ESQ. SB# 66056 DAVID M. DANIELS, ESQ. SB# 170315 NICHOLAS P. FORESTIERE, SB# 125118 GURNEE & DANIELS LLP 2240 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 150 Roseville, CA 95661-3805 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Defendants

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, SCI FUNERAL AND CEMETERY PURCHASING COOPERATIVE, INC., SCI EASTERN MARKET SUPPORT CENTER, L.P. SCI WESTERN MARKET SUPPORT CENTER, L.P., SCI HOUSTON MARKET SUPPORT CENTER, L.P., JANE D. JONES, GWEN PETTEWAY, THOMAS RYAN and CURTIS BRIGGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) CLAUDE BRYANT, et al., on behalf of themselves and all other employees and former ) ) employees similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) SERVICE CORPORATION ) INTERNATIONAL et al. ) ) Defendants. ) )

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-01190 SI [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SCHEDULING MOTION TO COMPEL

Pursuant to the Joint Report of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 1. Defendants shall serve, no later than February 9, 2009, an additional supplemental

response to Interrogatory No. 22 of Plaintiffs' Interrogatories to Curtis Briggs and any additional [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SCHEDULING MOTION TO COMPEL Case No.: 3:08-CV-01190 SI 1

Case 3:08-cv-01190-SI

Document 114-2

Filed 01/29/2009

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

supplemental response Defendants intend to provide to Interrogatory No. 22 of Plaintiffs' Interrogatories. 2. The Court will hear argument on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel on March 20, 2009,

and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel shall be due not less than 35 days prior to the hearing date, Defendant's opposition shall be due not less than 21 days before the hearing date, and Plaintiffs' reply shall be due not less than 14 days before the hearing date. 3. The hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and the Further Case Management

Conference shall be continued to a date to be determined by the Court at the March 20, 2009 hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Honorable Susan Illston United States District Court

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SCHEDULING MOTION TO COMPEL Case No.: 3:08-CV-01190 SI

2