Vallimont v. Chevron Research and Technology Co. et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING 41 Stipulation Re: Briefing Schedules. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/17/09. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:08-cv-01227-JSW Document 41 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BETH A. HUBER (SBN 184702) THE HUBER LAW FIRM 1104 LINCOLN AVE San Rafael, CA 94901 Telephone: (415) 456-4411 Facsimile: (415) 456-3811 DAVID SHANE (SBN 109890) SHANE & TAITZ 1000 Drakes Landing Road, Suite 200 Greenbrea, CA 94904-3027 Telephone: (415) 464-2020 Facsimile: (415) 464-2024 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEPHEN VALLIMONT ROBERT D. EASSA (SBN 107970) DELIA A. ISVORANU (SBN 226750) FILICE BROWN EASSA & McLEOD LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800 Oakland, California 94612-0850 Telephone: (510) 444-3131 Facsimile: (510) 839-7940 Attorneys for Defendants CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY AND JIM EVERARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN VALLIMONT, Plaintiff, v. CHEVRON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY and JIM EVERARD, Defendants. ______________________________________/ Trial Date: June 15, 2009 Case No. C 08-01227 JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Case 3:08-cv-01227-JSW Document 41 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, Plaintiff STEPHEN VALLIMONT ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CHEVRON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY and JIM EVERARD ("Defendants"), do by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree that based upon the original hearing date of April 24, 2009 for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, which the court by order dated March 16, 2009 continued to May 29, 2009, that Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by no later than April 3, 2009, which is 21 days prior to the April 24, 2009 hearing date and the original due date for said opposition, and Defendant's reply brief shall be filed by no later than April 10, 2009. The parties make this request for several reasons, including because: (1) the above briefing schedule is the same as the briefing schedule based upon the April 24, 2009 hearing date; and (2) Plaintiff's lead counsel is unavailable on March 27-30 because she is conducting a deposition out of state for a witness in another matter who will be unavailable after March 30, 2009 and as such, the deposition cannot be changed. Dated: March 16, 2009 By: HUBER LAW FIRM _________/s/_______________________ Beth Huber Attorneys for Plaintiff, STEPHEN VALLIMONT FILICE BROWN EASSA & McLEOD By: ___________/s/______________________ Robert D. Eassa Delia A. Isvoranu Attorneys for Defendants, CHEVRON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY and JIM EVERARD Dated: _____________, 2009 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2 Case 3:08-cv-01227-JSW Document 41 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER After reviewing the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's opposition brief to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by no later than April 3, 2009 and Defendant's reply brief shall be filed by no later than April 10, 2009. . 17 DATED: March ______, 2009 ____________________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE, Judge United States District Court STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?