Lapiner v. Camtek, Ltd et al

Filing 48

ORDER. Defendants shall have 30 pages for their motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the CAC no later than February 17, 2009, and the schedule set by the Court in its January 5, 2009 order shall otherwise remain the same. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 22, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BRUCE G. VANYO (SBN: 60134) EMAIL: bruce.vanyo@kattenlaw.com RICHARD H. ZELICHOV (SBN: 193858) EMAIL: richard.zelichov@kattenlaw.com KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, California 90067-3012 Telephone: 310.788.4400 Facsimile: 310.788.4471 Attorneys for Defendants Camtek, Ltd., Rafi Amit, Ronit Dulberg, Yotam Stern, and Moshe Amit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) YUVAL LAPINER, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CAMTEK, LTD., RAFI AMIT, RONIT DULBERG, YOTAM STERN and MOSHE AMIT Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: (A) SERVICE OF PROCESS; (B) REQUEST BY DEFENDANTS TO ALLOW THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS ON BEHALF OF ALL DEFENDANTS TO BE 30 PAGES IN LENGTH; AND (C) MINOR MODIFICATION TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE DUE TO PRESIDENT'S DAY 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 31468849 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 31468849 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: A. Defendants shall have 30 pages for their motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint ("CAC"). B. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the CAC no later than February 17, 2009 and the schedule set by the Court in its January 5, 2009 order shall otherwise remain the same. 22 Dated: January __, 2009 United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?