Lapiner v. Camtek, Ltd et al
Filing
65
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT. Plaintiff shall file any second consolidated amended class action complaint by no later than July 10, 2009. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond thereto by no later than August 14, 2009. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 10, 2009 is continued to November 13, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 1, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)
1 BRUCE G. VANYO (SBN: 60134) EMAIL: bruce.vanyo~kattenlaw.com 2 RICHARD H. ZELICHOV (SBN: 193858) EMAIL: richard.zelichov~kattenlaw.com 3 KA TTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
4 Los Angeles, California 90067-3012 Telephone: 310.788.4400 5 Facsimile: 310.788.4471
6 Attorneys for Defendants
Camtek, Ltd., Rafi Amit, Ronit Dulberg,
7 Y otam Stem, and Moshe Amit
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Case No. 08-cv-01327-MMC
YUV AL LAPINER, Individually and on 12 Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated,
13
(PROPOSED) ORDER RE:
((A) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND
(B) SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
14
15
CAMTEK, LTD., RAFI AMIT, RONIT DULBERG, YOTAM STERN and MOSHE AMIT
Defendants.
16 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 27
") Sl
No.08-cv-OI327-MMC ¡PROPOSED! ORDER 31468849
(PROPOSED) ORDER
2
3
IT is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
A.
Plaintiff shall fie any second consolidated amended class action complaint by no
4 later than July 10, 2009.
5
B.
Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to any second consolidated amended
6 class action complaint by no later than August 14, 2009.
7
C.
The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 10, 2009 shall be
8 continued until November 13,2009.
9
10
1 11 Dated: July _, 2009 United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 27
No.08-cv-OI327-MMC ¡PROPOSED! ORDER 31468849
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?