Lapiner v. Camtek, Ltd et al

Filing 69

ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendants shall file their motion by August 17, 2009. Plaintiff shall file his opposition by September 17, 2009. Defendants shall file their reply by October 16, 2009. The motion shall be heard on October 30, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 BRUCE G. VANYO (SBN: 60134) EMAIL: bruce.vanyo@kattenlaw.com RICHARD H. ZELICHOV (SBN: 193858) EMAIL: richard.zelichov@kattenlaw.com KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, California 90067-3012 Telephone: 310.788.4400 Facsimile: 310.788.4471 Attorneys for Defendants Camtek, Ltd., Rafi Amit and Ronit Dulberg UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) YUVAL LAPINER, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 31490447 CAMTEK, LTD., RAFI AMIT and RONIT DULBERG, Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 08-cv-01327-MMC [PROPOSED] ORDER 31490447 [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: A. Defendants shall file their motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (the "Motion to Dismiss) by August 17, 2009. his B. Plaintiff shall file their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 17, 2009. C. 2009. D. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be heard by the Court on October 30, 2009. Defendants shall file their reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss by October 16, 7 Dated: August ___, 2009 ____________________________________ United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?