Black v. Potter

Filing 59

ORDER granting request to continue litigation schedule. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Alan P. Jacobus, No. 206954 Vance A. Woodward, No. 231730 CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP Attorneys at Law 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.989.5900 Facsimile: 415.989.0932 Email: ajacobus@cbmlaw.com vwoodward@cbmlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD BLACK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION HAROLD BLACK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant. No. C 08-1344 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CBM-IPG \SF468983.2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES (NO. C 08-1344 SI) Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby enter into the following stipulation and request its approval by the Court. WHEREAS the fact discovery cut-off has been set as February 27, 2010, and WHEREAS the current deadline to move for summary judgment is March 19, 2010, with opposition papers due April 2, 2010, and reply papers due April 9, 2010, and hearing set for April 23, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., and WHEREAS the parties believe they have in good faith and with good progress proceeded with the exchange of written discovery and the taking of depositions, and WHEREAS the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to modify discovery and motion deadlines on February 26, 2010 (Docket 57), one day before the discovery cut off and before the completion of a deposition being taken that same day, and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS partly based on evidence developed during the deposition taken on February 26, 2010, the parties now seek to take three more depositions, and WHEREAS the defendant has requested a further short extension of time (to March 10, 2010) to respond to written questions in lieu or a rule 30(b)(6) deposition on certain topics beyond what was requested in the parties' stipulation of February 26, 2010, ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree and request the Court to modify the case management schedule as follows so as to afford them sufficient time to take three additional depositions and prepare summary judgment motions: Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff: Move from 2/27/10 to 4/30/10. Deadline to Bring Fact-Discovery Motions: 5/14/10. Deadline to File MSJs: Move from 3/19/10 to 5/28/10. Deadline to File Oppositions to MSJs: From 4/2/10 to 6/11/10. Deadline to File Replies in Support of MSJs: From 4/9/10 to 6/18/10. Hearing on MSJs: Move from 4/23/10 to 7/16/10, at 9:00 am. Designation of Experts: Move from 5/7/10 to 8/6/10. Designation of Rebuttal Experts: Move from 5/28/10 to 8/27/10. Expert Discovery Cutoff: Move from 6/18/10 to 9/17/10. Pre-Trial Conference Date: Move from 8/10/10 to 11/9/10, at 3:30 pm. Jury Trial Date: Move from 8/23/10 to 11/22/10, at 8:30 am. /// /// /// /// /// /// CBM-IPG \SF468983.2 -2(NO. C 08-1344 SI) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Furthermore, the parties have mutually agreed upon any of the following three Magistrate Judges to preside over a settlement conference: Edward M. Chen, Maria-Elena James, and Elizabeth D. Laporte. To the extent schedules and the convenience of the Court permit, the parties would request the case be referred to one of the three foregoing Magistrate Judges for the settlement conference, to be held sometime between 7/16/10 and 8/6/10. Dated: March 8, 2010 CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP By /s/ Vance A. Woodward Alan P. Jacobus Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD BLACK Dated: March 8, 2010 U.S. ATTORNEY By /s/ Michael T. Pyle Joseph P. Russoniello Attorneys for Defendant JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: Judge Susan Illston United States District Judge CBM-IPG \SF468983.2 -3(NO. C 08-1344 SI) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?