Weinrib v. The PMI Group, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER continuing cmc to 2/19/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009)

Case3:08-cv-01405-SI Document63

Filed12/09/09 Page1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] MEREDITH N. LANDY (S.B. #136489) PETER T. SNOW (S.B. #222117) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 2765 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants The PMI Group, Inc., L. Stephen Smith, Bradley M. Shuster, David H. Katkov and Donald P. Lofe, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE THE PMI GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. C-08-1405-SI

CLASS ACTION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

ALL ACTIONS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING MATTERS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C-08-1405-SI

Case3:08-cv-01405-SI Document63

Filed12/09/09 Page2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION WHEREAS, on July 24, 2009, Lead Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws ("First Amended Complaint"); WHEREAS, on September 2, 2009, defendants The PMI Group, Inc., L. Stephen Smith, Bradley M. Shuster, David H. Katkov and Donald P. Lofe, Jr. (collectively, "Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on November 2, 2009, the Court entered an Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and set a Case Management Conference for December 16, 2009, at 2:30 p.m.; WHEREAS, on November 16, 2009, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court entered an order extending Defendants' time to file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint to December 21, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred, and due to scheduling conflicts of Defendants' counsel, agree that a brief continuance of the Case Management Conference is necessary and that additional time is necessary for Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, a continuance of the Case Management Conference and an extension of time for Defendants to file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case, including discovery; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to exchange their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 no later than December 21, 2009; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that discovery may commence on December 16, 2009, as if the Case Management Conference were held on that date; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court enter an order, as follows: 1. 2:30 p.m. //
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C-08-1405-SI

The Case Management Conference shall be continued to February 19, 2010, at

Case3:08-cv-01405-SI Document63

Filed12/09/09 Page3 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

Defendants shall file their Answer to the First Amended Complaint on or before

January 21, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Dated: December 9, 2009

By:

/s/ Meredith N. Landy Meredith N. Landy

Attorneys for Defendants The PMI Group, Inc., L. Stephen Smith, Bradley M. Shuster, David H. Katkov and Donald P. Lofe, Jr. COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

Dated: December 9, 2009

By:

/s/ Jeffrey W. Lawrence Jeffrey W. Lawrence

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Locals 302 and 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated

I, Meredith N. Landy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference and Extending Time to File Answer to First Amended Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jeffrey W. Lawrence has concurred in this filing. By: /s/ Meredith N. Landy _______________ Meredith N. Landy

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C-08-1405-SI

Case3:08-cv-01405-SI Document63

Filed12/09/09 Page4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MP1:1186862.2

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December __, 2009 The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C-08-1405-SI