Polk v. Cavin et al

Filing 179

ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 10, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/10/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 SUSAN MAE POLK, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. C 08-1483 MMC (PR) ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS v. DEPUTY JAMES CAVIN, et al., Defendants. / 16 17 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, the following motions, each filed by plaintiff Susan 18 Mae Polk, are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the 19 convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (1) “Motion for Order to Compel the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Dept. to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecums,” filed July 10, 2012; (2) “Motion for Order to Compel Publishers & Editors of the S.F. Chronicle & the Contra Costa Times to Comply with Subpoenas Duces Tecums,” filed July 10, 2012; (3) “Motion to Compel Forensic Medical Group to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecums,” filed July 18, 2012; (4) “Motion to Compel Department of Motor Vehicles to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecums,” filed July 23, 2012; (5) “Objection to Violation of Court’s Order to Public Defender to Comply with SDT & 1 Violation of Attorney/Client Privilege by Public Defender; Request for Order to Comply & 2 Impose Sanctions,” filed July 30, 2012; and 3 4 5 (6) “Motion for Order to US Marshall to Serve Subpoena Duces Tecums,” filed August 1, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED 6 7 Dated: August 10, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?